User talk:Nicole drummond1

John Loe

December 2016
The article John Loe has been deleted, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. There were two reasons for that, either one of which would have been sufficient grounds for deletion. Firstly, the article was unambiguously promotional. A Wikipedia article must be written from a neutral point of view, and not seek to impress the reader with the subject and how successful or good that subject is. Secondly, the contents of the article were substantially copied from another web site. That means that it was a copyright infringement, unless the copyright owner has released it for free reuse by anyone in the world, either unchanged or modified in any way whatsoever, for any purpose, subject only to attribution to Wikipedia. Even in the very unlikely event that the copyright owner has licensed the content as freely as that, we need proof of the fact: we don't assume that copyright is OK because somebody creates a Wikipedia account and posts the content here. It is possible to provide copyright release to Wikipedia, but it is almost never worth doing so, as content copied from a company's web site is almost sufficiently promotional to be deleted for that reason anyway. I think I should also let you know that from what I have seen, John Loe probably doesn't satisfy Wikipedia's [[WP:NOTE|notability guidelines, and if he doesn't then no article about him is suitable for Wikipedia, no matter how it may be written. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Nicole drummond1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article John Loe, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Doug Robinson, from its old location at User:Nicole drummond1/sandbox/Doug Robinson. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doug Robinson (May 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doug Robinson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Doug Robinson concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Doug Robinson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Doug Robinson


Hello, Nicole drummond1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Doug Robinson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHappy Holidays! • Contribs 04:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)