User talk:Nicolew1995/sandbox/Water installation

Peer Review
I just want to make the disclaimer that I'm not sure what wiki's guidelines are for translating source files, so if any of my suggestions go against those guidelines feel free to disregard. With that being said I would recommend adjusting the structure. There's a large section that just contains a couple long lists. I would check other wiki articles to see if the topics match anything you're talking about. Providing links to words like Copolymer allow readers who are less familiar with the terms to quickly research the information. Make sure the Bibliography and See Also headings get their own sections. With the structure, I would suggest creating a general heading with subheadings broken down as the source file dictates, and then Bibliography and See Also headings. I'll assume your translation is perfect :) Joeyw526 (talk) 03:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

________________________________________________

- I think that the outline of the content is decent. I assume more text will probably follow some of the sections.

- With the sources, I am not sure whether they should be English or if they can be used remain Polish sources for an article in English.

- It might be worth adding more information from other sources to increase the length of the article

- For formatting, there should be larger section headings and maybe a few pictures

Peer Review Pt. 2
I suggest following the format of the source document. It's easier on the eyes and simple to find information a reader might be looking for. This will also create a contents box while makes it even easier to scroll through the document Link words that have other wiki pages. Once again the source document will be good here. The document could also use a picture with an info box that had other related topics and quick info about the page. Joeyw526 (talk) 22:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)