User talk:Nicolewonderlin/sandbox

Group #22
Review #1 Good start with the chem box, there's a lot of good information there. If you can find a picture of the chemical that would be a great addition to the page. I'm sure you're aware, but you're going to need to find more information on the compound. How is it prepared? Are there any chemical reactions it is involved in? How was it discovered? What are some of its physical properties (that aren't in the chembox already)? Expand upon the uses of your compound. Give an example if you can of how it is used as a catalyst.

I see that your other pages are mostly done, so hopefully you can focus on this page in the upcoming weeks. Obviously, not everything I suggested has to be written about or is even available information anywhere. Do the best you can to provide as much information as possible and find the references to support that information. Hope this helps!

Tom Smith Tsmith60 (talk) 17:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #2

The chem box looks good, but more information needs to be added to the article, which you're probably already planning on doing. You could include sections like on your other pages, about the history, reactions, etc. Also, make sure the formatting on your references is correct! (For your second reference, the date continues on to the next column, maybe you can just clean it up a little by having one column for references?) Other than that, just keep working on it, maybe a graph or pictures could would be a good idea. Good luck!

Tijana Popovic Tpopovi2 (talk) 20:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #3

I see you guys were able to find a lot of things for the chembox. That is some of the points toward your total. As you know you should try to expand a little on this article to get some more points. I assume this article was not as detailed because it was hard to find some information on it (I can totally relate). Well if that is the case then focus on your other articles to get a majority of points from them, and if you can, find some things like reactions or some history for this article and you should be ok. Make sure your references are formatted correctly like it was stated above and that they are credible sources.

Alex Plavnik Plavnik2 (talk) 24:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #4

As you already know, the info on this chemical is a little sparse, but I'm sure you were putting all of your focus into your other pages! If info is hard to find on this chemical, the chembox should be good enough to get you extra points. Having four pages, you should have no problems meeting all the point requirements for credit! The resources list also looks a little funky. They should be in list format, not side-by-side. Also, maybe change the section headers to look like your other pages. Good luck!

Nicole Wank Wank2 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

This article is not ready to be uploaded
Please do not upload this article until your teacher has interacted with the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)