User talk:Nicolewright24/sandbox

FIXED A FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS! POSSIBLY ADD MORE ABOUT GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP? REALLY GOOD ARTICLE!

Censorship is an issue commonly involved in the discussion of information ethics because it describes the inability to access or express opinions or information based on the belief it is bad for others to view this opinion or information.[1] Sources acknowledged as commonly censored include books, articles, speeches, art work, data, music and photos.[1] Censorship can be perceived both as ethical and non-ethical in the field of information ethics.

Those who believe censorship is ethical say the practice prevents readers from being exposed to offensive and objectionable material.[1] Topics such as sexism, racism, homophobia and anti-semitism that are present in public works are widely seen as unethical in the public eye to expose to the world, especially the young generation.[2] The Australian Library Journal states proponents for censorship in libraries, the practice of librarians deciphering which books/ resources to keep in their libraries, argue the act of censorship is an ethical way to provide information to the public that is considered morally sound, allowing positive ethics instead of negative ethics to be dispersed.[2] According to the same journal, librarians have an "ethical duty" to protect the minds ,particularly young people, of those who read their books through the lens of censorship to prevent the readers from adopting the unethical ideas and behaviors portrayed in the books.[2]

However, others in the field of information ethics argue the practice of censorship is unethical, because it fails to provide all available information to the community of readers. British philosopher, John Stuart Mill, argued censorship is unethical because it goes directly against the moral concept of utilitarianism.[3] Mill believes humans are unable to have true beliefs when information is withheld from the population via censorship and acquiring true beliefs without censorship leads to greater happiness.[3] According to this argument, true beliefs and happiness (of which both concepts are considered ethical) cannot be obtained through the practice of censorship. Librarians and others who disperse information to the public also face the dilemma of the ethics of censorship through the argument that censorship harms students and is morally wrong because they are unable to know the full extent of knowledge available to the world.[2] The debate of information ethics in censorship was highly contested when schools removed information about evolution from libraries and curriculums due to the topic conflicting with religious beliefs.[2] In this case, advocates against ethics in censorship argue it is more ethical to include multiple sources information on a subject, such as creation, to allow the reader to learn and decipher their beliefs.[2]

Culture also plays a large part in the information ethics of censorship because culture largely defines what a society sees as ethical.[2] The ethics of information for a particular culture at a particular point in history is very different from the ethics of information today. For example, according to a study from the International Journal of Business and Social Science focusing on opinions of different information ethics issues, Chinese and American students differed in their answers regarding censorship largely due to the Confucianism (respecting innate morality and maintaining good social relationships) and Judeo-Christianity (respecting fairness and equality) cultures they were raised in, respectively.[

Mckenziedunleavy (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Elizabeth's Comments
First Paragraph:
 * confused with the wording- "sources acknowledged as commonly censored include"

Second Paragraph:
 * "Topics such as" -kinda lengthy, reword to something like, "Topics such as.. are present in public works, and are widely seen as unethical in the public eye. There is concern regarding the exposure of such topics to the world, especially the young generation"

Third paragraph:
 * change "other in the field of information ethics argue.." to "the other side to the argument of information ethics is.." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabeththies (talk • contribs) 16:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)