User talk:Nicoli102

May 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Indeed. You may edit my article, Viyce, as much as you wish to suit your own preferred levels of neutrality. Nicoli102 (talk) 01:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viyce (May 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DannyS712 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viyce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Viyce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Viyce Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DannyS712&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Viyce reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Viyce


A tag has been placed on Draft:Viyce, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 03:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Fraction7. EdJohnston (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * See also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Fraction7. EdJohnston (talk) 11:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Viyce
Hello, Nicoli102,

Please be aware that the administrators on Wikipedia are aware of the many times you have tried to get an article written about your home movie on YouTube. If Wikipedia had an article about everyone's personal videos on YouTube, it would have a billion articles instead of 6 million. We have standards of notability and your home movie has none. If you ever get sustained coverage of your film in RELIABLE SOURCES (newspapers, media blogs, books, etc.), we can consider maybe composing a draft. But right now, it is just your personal video and it is not eligible for a Wikipedia article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)