User talk:Nicsinic

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enlightened self actualism (June 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enlightened self actualism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Enlightened_self_actualism Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hey_man_im_josh&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Enlightened_self_actualism reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 16:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * i invented the buzzwords and the adoption of principle are you saying because you do not know me i am not reliable? Nicsinic (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't speak for Hey man im josh but even if we knew you, your word wouldn't be reliable. Wikipedia article rely on reliable sources to verify the information contained in them is notable. Wikipedia doesn't publish everyone's thoughts and essays on philosophy. It's an encyclopedia with referenced articles about notable subjects. Your opinions, Hey man im josh's opinions, my opinions are not considered notable unless they have received coverage and analysis by media or academic sources evaluating them and judging them to be notable.
 * If you want a less restrictive platform with few rules where you can put forth all of your ideas about life and philosophy, I suggest you get yourself a blog or website. There, you can write whatever you want and they are free these days. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Enlightened self actualism
Hello, Nicsinic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enlightened self actualism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Enlightened self actualism


Hello, Nicsinic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Enlightened self actualism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)