User talk:Nicvanheurck

June 2014
Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ventilation (physiology) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Dwpaul  Talk   04:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cellular respiration. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cellular respiration was changed by Nicvanheurck (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913763 on 2014-06-17T04:32:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gas exchange with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —John Cline (talk) 04:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)