User talk:Nierva

Human rights section
I would recommend just remaining calm, withhold your personal opinion on the issue, and continue to rely on specific wiki policy. I believe your argument has merit, but would hate to see you get entangled in a contentious edit war. You have provided your burden of proof, now request theirs. Red thoreau (talk) RT 19:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Enviroboy TalkCs 00:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

3RR
3RR: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Korean War
Please stop edit-warring. The source you have provided is extremely unreliable; if you really think it's usable, why don't you post it at Reliable sources/Noticeboard for the experts there to decide? Also, I'll warn you that you've reverted 3 times in a very short time today; if you revert someone else who removes the problematic text, I will not hesitate to block you for disruption. Discuss the issues instead. Parsecboy (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not the place to be threatening people. You have not been exercising in good faith demonstrated by how my motives have been questioned. Your obstruction with regard to the Korean War article has no basis in Wikipedia's guidelines. Nierva (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I have not threatened you, I have merely warned you that disruptive actions have consequences. I have also not questioned your motives. On the contrary, my actions on the Korean War article are solidly grounded in policies: WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV. Parsecboy (talk) 23:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I take back what I said about questioning my motives. It was a different user who did that. Nierva (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I am in the process of posting a request at the RS noticeboard to have the KCNA link evaluated. Parsecboy (talk) 23:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)