User talk:Nigel Wilkins27330

July 2019
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of University of Cambridge people, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  freshacconci  (✉) 14:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of University of Cambridge people.  freshacconci  (✉) 12:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Repeatedly adding names that aren't remotely notable
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

The Site "Cambridge People" contains many extremely famous people, and also many reasonably successful academics. I am sad that the addition of Nigel Wilkins (Literary Scholar and Musician) should be considered "an act of vandalism" and that he should be said to be "not remotely notable". Wikipédia (French) saw fit to include a page on him, listing his achievements and publications. The assessor "Jamie" who blocked his account clearly has no knowledge of this. I hope he will check it up and revise his opinion!


 * What the French Wikipedia does has no bearing on what English Wikipedia does. You were warned repeatedly against inserting the name of someone with no article on Wikipedia, yet you continued to do so. An article asserting notability -- with verifiable sources -- would be acceptable on this list. Your user name indicates that you are Nigel Wilkins or at the very least you are connected in some way. That's a conflict of interest. It is not up to other Wikipedia editors -- all volunteers -- to ensure that Nigel Wilkins is notable. Nor are we obligated to cater to just anyone's whim. If Wilkins is notable, someone (not Wilkins himself) should write an article. Disrupting Wikipedia earns you no allies or sympathy. Wikipedia does not "owe" you a place on any list.  freshacconci  (✉) 17:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

If there is no correlation at all between English Wikipedia and other language versions, that is very curious and ought to be corrected. Whoever has "condemned" me has made no effort to explore the topic. Can one appeal to some higher authority?