User talk:NightXenon999

Welcome!

 * OK. Your edits are totally unhelpful, and restoring them doesn't make them magically better. You turn wikilinks into links to the wrong articles and add unverified and most likely trivial information. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tiger because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Dwpaul  Talk   23:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of piscine and amphibian humanoids, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Serendi pod ous  21:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of piscine and amphibian humanoids, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —S MALL JIM   21:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of piscine and amphibian humanoids.  Serendi pod ous  22:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 05:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please use more descriptive edit summaries. For example when you remove something then explain why you removed it (unless it's obvious, like removing nonsense or vandalism). Especially when you get reverted for making unexplained strange edits then you have to provide a good reason for making that edit again. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 11:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is also a collaborative project and communication is required, including reacting to messages left on your talk page. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 08:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Please look up the word chronologically. Your use of the word here and here have nothing to do with chronological order (in fact, they get the chronology of evolution wrong). Ian.thomson (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm afraid "I fixed the information" is not very informative - an edit summary should tell other editors what the edit actually did. Note that it is not necessary to qualify all information in articles such as Largest organisms with "known", and in some cases it does not even make sense to include "known", like here - "previously thought to be the largest known squid". A couple of different people have reverted the additions, so please don't restore them without first discussing it on the article's talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 15:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of legendary creatures, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

I see that you're still using "chronologically" in a completely wrong matter in your edit summaries. The more you do that, the easier it becomes to assume you're trolling. Refusing to communicate doesn't help with that either. If you are editing in good faith, but are incapable of communicating with other editors, you're not really in a position to fix typos on the English Wikipedia. Perhaps you should edit the edition of Wikipedia that is in your native language.

When you make an edit summary, say what kind of specific changes you made. For example, in this edit, "I added information about Nagas in the game Shantae" would explain what you did better than "I added more information." In this edit, "I changed the link ape to non-human ape" explains what you did. "I fixed the information" tells us nothing. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Reach Out to the Truth. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mario without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Reach Out to the Truth 22:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sedentary lifestyle. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Quit giving useless edit summaries
In this edit you said "I edited the information". That is absolutely useless. You should have said what information you edited and what you edited it to. Multiple users have asked you about this before. The edits you do this for are usually reverted for various reasons. Are you simply not here to edit constructively? In this edit, you changed the meaning so that it was wrong. In this edit, you appear to have been engaging in deliberate insertion of errors. In this edit, you removed sourced information and seem to have lied about what you were doing.

You also need to respond to messages. If you do not respond to this message, it will be very hard to assume that you are not a troll account seeing what you can get away with.

If I see you use "I fixed the information" as an edit summary one more time, I will assume that you are not capable of understanding basic instructions.

Respond to this message and quit giving useless edit summaries. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:01, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for either a stubborn refusal or total inability to communicate meaningfully. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Communication is an absolute necessity for working on this encyclopedia. If you cannot or will not do so, you should find another site. If you want to be unblocked, you are going to have to explain why you regularly gave totally useless edit summaries despite being told not to do so, and explain why you continually refused to all attempts to communicate.  Ian.thomson (talk) 12:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)