User talk:Nightbreak48

Spam in Pagan Christianity
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pagan Christianity, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pagan Christianity is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pagan Christianity, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Organic Christianity
Another editor has added the  template to the article Organic Christianity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Pagan Christianity
This article was actually tagged by two editors before me as "advertising" and "nn (non-notable) book" I assume that the first was because although the text was neutral, the only link was to a sales page. I would have deleted the article anyway, since it did not provide independent verifiable references to show that it met the notability guidelines, Jimfbleak (talk) 06:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I note that Organic Christianity is facing the same problems, but since it is tagged, I've left it for now Jimfbleak (talk) 06:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)