User talk:Nightingale8283

Welcome
Hello, Nightingale8283 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! GabeIglesia (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia -- It looks like you've successfully followed the directions in the assignment and made a few edits! I'll be giving out Wikipedia assignment #3 to the class on Monday! -- Sethant (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Assignment #3
Looks like you've completed assignment #3 successfully! Awesome! -- Sethant (talk) 05:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Review for assignment #5
Howdy! For your first review for Wikipedia assignment #5, check out the proposed edits made at User:Michael.weeks/sandbox and leave a comment about something you like and something you think they could improve further! - Sethant (talk) 06:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Review
Your changes help make things more easy to understand and simple for those who may not know much about chemistry. I like that you defined all the terms and included specifics and units with some. One thing you could maybe include is the definition for ΔE°. You explain ΔG, ΔG°, and ΔE. So maybe just mention ΔE°, that way people are not confused. (Dsports1 (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC))

Second review for assignment #5
Howdy! For your second review for Wikipedia assignment #5, check out the proposed edits made at User talk:Pitts0608/sandbox and leave a comment about something you like and something you think they could improve further! - Sethant (talk) 05:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Review for your proposed edits - Drew P. Branch
Hi! I looked over your proposed edits for the Gibbs free energy page. I only see a few really minor changes. Could you expand your descriptions or elaborate on all the relationships to work available, cell potential, or the Nernst equation? Just a thought. Also, you've written that Q is equal to 1 for G0. While that is true, you may also want to point out the concentrations are equal to 1M or standard state.

You're a great writer, and have so much to contribute. I hope you just let it all go a bit to show your stuff. I see also you included links to other pages in your edits which is a good thing, and something I forgot. Good job!

Kirwan, aka Drew.P.Branch (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

CHE260 assignment 6
Looks like you successfully completed assignment 6 and took your edits live! Awesome! -- Sethant (talk) 23:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)