User talk:Nightmote/sandbox CRU Hackining Incident

Note - as a thought/suggestion. Your opinions? Hipocrite (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Also - and the tit-for-tat. Hipocrite (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I rather like your super-chop to the emails section! We could use a link to an external source if folks want to read 'em. I like your attribution less - sceptics may, indeed, have dubbed this "Climategate" but I think that we can avoid mention of AGW without taking away from the article. Who came up with the term might, indeed, suggest an agenda, but couldn't it also just be considered trivia? Nightmote (talk) 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Fine, I cave. Hipocrite (talk) 18:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Awesome! We're done! I'll post it .... like hell! Nightmote (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I fully support attempting to take the current version (with fixed refs, which I'll do) live. Everything is pure improvement. Hipocrite (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow. You'd really *do* that? (shrug) Fine by me. I like it. It will cause a serious fire storm, though I betcha. But you have my blessings. Nightmote (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh - you mean *me*! Nightmote (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * (grin) Okey-dokey! You fix the refs, I'll change it out and to hell with the consequences. (head shake) I haven't been blocked, yet. Probably I'm due. Might as well be hung for a goat as a sheep. Nightmote (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)