User talk:Nightwing Returns

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Nightwing Returns! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ~ QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 03:15, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

August 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. S warm  ♠  19:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * No, you falsely claimed that you were "fixing a factual error" in your edit summary, when in reality you were inserting unsourced and unverifiable information to a biography of a recently-deceased person, in breach of WP:BLP, and then repeatedly re-added it without providing a source, in violation of WP:V. So, that by itself is a big deal. That's not to mention the fact that you were saying he died of AIDS, which obviously looks like vandalism. I will give you a chance to rewrite this unblock request in order to better comply with WP:GAB, but I'm not buying that your edits were not vandalism and will be revoking your talk page access if you fail to do so, because your current one seems frivilous. S warm   ♠  20:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Further details are needed. Please provide the source that you supposedly derived that information from, as you're claiming that you were simply updating the article in good faith to reflect a source you read, and not intending to vandalize. If that is truly the case, I find it hard to believe that you don't understand how the misunderstanding happened and feel you are being unfairly blocked and now "blackmailed". I would think you would be working with me to try to clear up the misunderstanding. If it was a dumb joke, just admit it and promise not to do it again and we'll give you another chance. It looks like a first offense. S warm   ♠  21:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)