User talk:Nik888

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ali Ahmeti has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ali Ahmeti was changed by Nik888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976293 on 2017-05-03T00:45:39+00:00.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 00:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.Jingiby (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 11:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 12:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 12:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingiby (talk) 12:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Stop your bulgarian propaganda

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/axxxl0/longtime_wikipedia_user_jingiby_has_been/

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Killer Chihuahua 13:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Esma Redžepova, you may be blocked from editing. — Luchesar • T/C 14:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * - this editor is already blocked. Killer Chihuahua
 * Thank you very much, KillerChihuahua! Sorry, hadn't checked the timestamp and thought it was an old block. Please feel free to strike through my warning if it isn't according to the policies here (I'm afraid nowadays I edit in enwiki a bit too rarely). — Luchesar • T/C 14:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Esma Redzepova is born in Skopje which is in Macedonia - NOT bulgaria. Its the capital of the republic of Macedonia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nik888 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Please discuss this on the talk page of the article once the block expires. — Luchesar • T/C 14:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have discussed it with jingiby who is adamant the Skopje is in Bulgaria. This is disinformation at its finest. Jingiby has been vandalising Macedonian pages since 2007 and it has to stopNik888 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * He isn't saying that “Skopje is in Bulgaria”. His point is that, at the moment of birth of Esma Redžepova, Skopje was within the borders of the then Kingdom of Bulgaria. And that is a historical fact (the fact of occupation is also undisputed, but probably irrelevant, given that we are talking about the information in the infobox). It may be debatable whether the country, specifically, must be shown according to the situation at the time (which I'd probably support), or according to the present conditions, that is, where the birthplace is located nowadays. But, in any case, what you've been entering into the article, the Socialist Republic of Macedonia, is absolutely inappropriate. Even the Democratic Federal Macedonia wouldn't be proclaimed for at least one more year after the birth of Redžepova. And, really, let's not continue this here. Please join the discussion at Talk:Esma Redžepova once your block expires. Thank you! — Luchesar • T/C 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It's still misleading information. Perhaps state Macedonia, then occupied by Bulgaria. That is the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nik888 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said, the proper place for this discussion is Talk:Esma Redžepova. — Luchesar • T/C 16:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)