User talk:Nikeetz

Unconstructive revert
Hi there, your revert here is not constructive, for a couple of reasons, one of which is that you did not provide a rational explanation for it. That said, here's why else your revert is inappropriate. If you copy within Wikipedia, you need to provide proper attribution per WP:PATT. That's not very hard to do, as detailed in the link. Secondly, if you're going to copy within Wikipedia, you need to include the references, which you did not do. Unsourced content is of no use to the project, and neither is sloppily-formatted content. I'm reverting your edit. Please do not submit the content again unless you plan to do it correctly, as it will be considered disruptive. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Joe Pytka. Your edits have or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Diff: As previously warned, your copy/paste is not properly attributed. It's actually very easy. See WP:CWW. '' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.