User talk:NikeofBelegost

Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, and is not limited to Electoral College for citing sources. need I remind you that Trump was considered president-elect at around this time?

Try reading the FAQ, or the past discussion sections above where the same points you already made were spoken, and got responses.

I understand that Wiki does not limit itself to singular sources, however, the Electoral College is what determines whom the President-Elect is and isn't Trump as many others before him were incorrectly called "Elect" before the EC met and confirmed. The media does not have the power to decide this. The EC isn't the source either. The Constitution of the United States is the source! Not to mention the Media and Social Media companies are horribly bias.

I was hoping that Wiki would be a real, neutral site that would support fact and not be politically bias, but that doesn't seem to be the case. The truth is not important to this site. Its no wonder the universities I attended wouldn't allow us to cite Wiki as sources for our research papers and cases since they were deemed not credible. I will remove my account shortly and not contribute to a site that promotes more trash that is already out there.

Thanks.
 * Please read what I said again. Wikipedia is not limited to official sources. The Constitution isn't "the source", it's an official source. And reliable sources are not limited to official. (BTW you should also check out the conversation in Joe Biden talk page talking about what the Constitution says and doesn't say.)
 * Frankly, if Trump decided to turn legitimacy of elections into a political wedge issue and sees that he and his side are losing, that's his own fault. He should not have done that. 2600:1012:B024:7B87:0:4D:D78A:3801 (talk) 18:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)