User talk:Nikhil1115

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeus (company) (May 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zeus (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zeus (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zeus_(company) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legacypac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zeus_(company) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 22:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Zeus (company) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zeus (company). Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeus (company) (June 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zeus (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zeus (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zeus_(company) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chetsford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zeus_(company) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 17:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Zeus (company) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zeus (company). Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undeclared paid editing in violation of the Terms of Use. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Huon (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Part of the evidence is private or might run afoul of WP:OUTING if published here. In case this block is contested without an admission of undeclared paid editing, I'll gladly supply the relevant evidence privately to any interested admin via email. I wouldn't have blocked the account if there hadn't been misleading and flat-out false statements in the IRC help channel which indicate that this is not an accidental omission but a deliberate attempt to mislead, combined with promotional editing here on Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I find that pretty much incomprehensible, sorry. Can you please make a clear statement on whether you have or have not ever edited Wikipedia for pay, as part of your job, or in any other situation described at WP:PAID? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I have NEVER edited Wikipedia for PAY! Wikipedia is a good platform to start building some writing skills. I have been writing on a lot of topics and those are updated on my LinkedIn profile and I write on Quora. I certainly don't write to get PAID on LinkedIn and Quora. This is my first ever article that I wanted to create, prior to this - I had no experience in writing to Wikipedia. I don't know -- how Huon contemplated this as "Spam". It's derogatory -- when it's not a spam. Thanks.

And, this is not certainly a part of job. I may have a designation called Digital Strategist -- but, Wikipedia is not a platform to blow the promotional trumpet. In my knowledge, Wikipedia is all about information; encyclopedia. If I had to spam -- I would have tested it using a spammy email address and wouldn't have used my personal email address. I would again request you -- this is not a PAID work. In lieu of this, if you still feel that NOTHING can prove this as unpaid work -- then please let me know, and I'd stop requesting you and wasting your time. Many Thanks.
 * I was only asking! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

You know what Zebedee, this company doesn't even know that I am working on a Wikipedia page. The only thing is I have an access to companies assets or their FB page and I -- with the consent of the company -- used the media and uploaded on Wiki (which most of thr editors deleted because it was coming from Facebook.) Which to me is utterly a legit action! I would have uploaded my own media -- which I would, if unblocked. Companies are generally looking for Sales and Wikipedia cannot provide the customers. Google provides more ways for promotions, though, and so customers. Wikipedia article -- I wouldn't reckon -- can help them much getting sales done. Anyway, I am really sorry if my tone was a bit strident. Thanks again for your help and asking the essential questions! :)


 * Since you gave your designation as "Digital Strategist", one of the top 11 positions at Zeus Packaging that get mentioned on their website, I'm sure you can explain how it isn't misleading to summarize your association with the company as "my friend works there". I'll also point reviewing admins to the signature at the OTRS ticket for one of your image uploads. How can "this company doesn't even know that I am working on a Wikipedia page" and "I -- with the consent of the company -- used the media and uploaded on Wiki" both be true? And which company, exactly, gave their consent for the use of an image whose metadata says it's copyrighted by Daniel Graves Photography with usage terms given as "free use with press release - overwise please contact"? And you're saying it's "utterly a legit action" to you to claim images as "own work" that are not your own work? Huon (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll add that the draft is quite spammy and, in combination with an undeclared conflict of interest, justifies a "spam-only account" block even if this really were not paid editing. Huon (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Detailed data passed to me (which cannot be openly shared here due to outing policy), suggests that we are not seeing full disclosure on the part of the user. I support denial of unblock request. Anthony Bradbury "talk" 11:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeus (company) (November 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zeus (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zeus (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zeus_(company) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Frayae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zeus_(company) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)