User talk:Nikhilk1

Sachin Tendulkar and Wisden Rankings
Please keep your nationalism, parochialism etc to yourself. Sachin Tendulkar is not even among the top TEN ODI batsmen ever according to the ICC and he was ranked a distant second to Vivian Richards in 2002 by Wisden - the ONLY instance that the ranking was ever done. The 'revision in 2003' is a LIE concocted by cheap fans of the cheap FTB that is SRT. In ODIs, Richards avgd 56 in Aus vs Aus with a SR of 90 and three centuries; SRT who avgs 34 with a SR < 80. Similarly in Eng vs Eng, in Pak vs Pak and in NZ vs NZ, Richards is FAR ahead in terms of average, strike-rate and centuries scored.

AND while this will be difficult for you to stomach, its but a FACT that Richards played in an era of uncovered pitches which were much faster and bouncier than anything that SRT has seen in his worst nightmares; and that was also without even a helmet and NOT a ton of protective gear like SRT wears; that was in an era where there were ZERO restrictions on the fastest bowlers ever who could bowl six bouncers at batsmen if they liked and not with a hundred restrictions like one-bouncer-per-over and fielding restrictions etc etc etc; AND Richards did it against far better bowlers and attacks; T'kar also got to open while Richards did not; T'kar also played the crappiest attacks in cricket history like Zimbabwe, Kenya, Bangladesh, Namibia etc several times to fatten his average and strike-rate.

Richards is 100X better according to many other calculations; So please do not insult the intelligence of Wikipedians by spreading such a lie. SRT was ranked 2 in 2002 which is a hundred times overrated which is good enough. In reality he is the greatest FTB ever - you missed out on that word - FTB. 98.221.122.175 (talk) 00:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Doktor Mandrake  00:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil kuchi
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nikhil kuchi, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jarkeld (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil kuchi
A tag has been placed on Nikhil kuchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 03:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)