User talk:Nikicia/sandbox

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Joselv83 (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review-	5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	Nikicia

URL of editor’s Userpage-	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page-	5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor-	5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)-	Good

Image (needed/appropriate)-	n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)-	Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-	Yes

Wikiformatting- could have added bullet points or numbers for more points

Grammar & composition-	Good

Other comments-	none

DJames5 (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Date of review	 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Nikicia URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor	 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short)	 Appropriate length of edit Image (needed/appropriate)	 None applicable for this edit Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	 Accurate information provided directly from text the text book Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	 N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	 Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting	Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition	Grammar and spelling were error free Other comments	Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Ramnel Cortorreal User:CRamel16 Date of review	 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Nikicia URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor	 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short)	 Meets Length Requirement Image (needed/appropriate)	 Not necessary for the edit Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	 Accurate information provided Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	 N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	 Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting	Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition	No Grammatical errors found Other comments	Good edit. CRamel16 (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer- F.Moshammad

Date of review	 5/10/2013

Name of editor-Nikicia.

URL of editor’s Userpage - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/10/13

Date review submitted to instructor	 5/10/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)-Not too long or too short Image (needed/appropriate)- Image is not needed but an image can improve the quality of the edit. Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)-The information is accurate Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- N/A Wikiformatting- The formatting looks good. Grammar & composition- Proper construction of edit Other comments	- Good Job!

F.Moshammad (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
VIMMYSEAJATAN 142.105.19.140 (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Vimmy (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)