User talk:Nikitam267

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gurgaon, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Gurgaon. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gurgaon, you may be blocked from editing.   Nitesh003 (talk) 08:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gurgaon.   Nitesh003 (talk) 08:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gurgaon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Nitesh003 (talk) 08:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)