User talk:Nikki10038

Nomination of Giorgia Mondani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgia Mondani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Giorgia Mondani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 16:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Legal threats
This account has been indefinitely blocked due to legal threats. Also likely undisclosed paid editing and socking. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Appears associated with User:Dottie S Block Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Maybe I'm missing something? I didn't see any legal threats before the block, and would not consider the above a legal threat. Undisclosed paid editing is likely, though; User:Akash.vg3309 and User:Akash.vg7778 seem connected. Huon (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I am assuming it was done through e-mail (since e-mail access has been turned off for this account), but I'll wait for clarification from . Alex Shih (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes the threats were through email. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have gone over the links with my Counsel and all email threads were supplied to my Attorney. There were NEVER any threats legal or of any sort to He is continuing to lie here on this thread. I have gone over this page in detail No legal threats I still have no idea who User:Dottie S Block is and why  is accusing me of knowing this individual.  I am providing the full email thread to any admin that requests it.   When I am home I will also go back to Guide to appealing blocks to file a proper unblock request, in addition to address the concern about undisclosed paid editing which is another false accusation by . Thank you
 * Yes I take that as a legal threat. You have compared my concerns over your editing to illegal activity and than you stated you were reporting them. Here you state you have forwards this to your lawyer which verifies my concerns. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 23:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not once, and I have clarified this with 5 of the members of the law firm I intern at that there was ever a legal threat presented at all in our emails back and forth. The only statement that I made was that you were harassing me which you are continuing to do now publicly. You also called me by the name of Dottie, who I am not sure who this is at all, you stated you sent me a request on Linked In which I do not have but proves continued public harassment and I am not nor have any affiliation with a User:Dottie S Block I still would like to know why you would tag the Showtime show Gigolos as also having been edited and created for payment so   I have made the creators and editors of that page aware of your false accusation and warning blocks as well.  Guide to appealing blocks Thank you and please see this above  and.

Dottie S Block (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Am I in some sort of trouble here? I've seen my name come up two or three times, with NO direct communication with me. I need to know if I'm in trouble for something! I have not intended any wrong and if I am in trouble here, I would like to resolve it as quickly as possible. Thank you.
 * Please see, who just recreated Giorgia Mondani using the exact same sources Nikki10038 used. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marklen Kennedy


The article Marklen Kennedy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A case of WP:PROMO with paid editing and suspiscions of sockpuppetry"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Fertig


The article Richard Fertig has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The company he founded has no article so the claim of significance is unproven. Also a case of WP:PROMO with paid editing and likely sockpuppetry."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)