User talk:NikkiBeanz/Asháninka language

Hi! Overall I think that the article is very good! It is easy to read and very interesting. I think that the lead can be a little longer. Maybe when you add more subtopics to your article, you can add more to the lead then. I would also recommend to add more pictures. Rebecca5802 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Final Review
Hi Nicole, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar, but is not sufficiently encyclopedic at points. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article generally follows the suggested template. 5 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by references to the scholarly literature. 4 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of the information is relevant to the subject of the language. 3 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1067/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 3 points.

The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 22:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)