User talk:Nikkimouse216

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gigi's Cupcakes, Lexington, Kentucky (April 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes, Lexington, Kentucky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gigi%27s_Cupcakes,_Lexington,_Kentucky Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gigi%27s_Cupcakes,_Lexington,_Kentucky reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes, Lexington, Kentucky


A tag has been placed on Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes, Lexington, Kentucky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes, from its old location at User:Nikkimouse216/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  14:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gigi's Cupcakes (April 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gigi%27s_Cupcakes Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wiae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gigi%27s_Cupcakes reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk  14:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gigi's Cupcakes (April 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gigi%27s_Cupcakes Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wiae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gigi%27s_Cupcakes reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk  16:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Draft:Gigi's Cupcakes. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Resubmitting a draft after it has been declined without making any improvements to it at all as tendentious. It does not increase the likelihood of acceptance (because the reviewers can see the previous decline) and annoys the reviewers.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

In this case, the draft was not only declined once, and resubmitted unchanged, but had already once been speedy-deleted as blatant advertising.

Further resubmissions without evidence of notability may require a block.'' Robert McClenon (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)