User talk:Nikkithompson617/sandbox

Article Evaluation Queensland Police Department
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? All article information appears relevant to topic.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? There is information from a wide range of years including 2018.
 * What else could be improved? This article appears to include any information I could think of adding.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There is a section about this departments support of the LGBT community, but it mentions no other specific type of support like this.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The criticism section has much more information than the others making the article seem biased against the Queensland Police Department.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? I checked a few links and they all let to viable sources.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? One source that was referenced led to an opinion post from a magazine article, but the bias was not present in the article specifically.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The topics in the talk page are from several years ago.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is rated C and is supported by WikiProject Queensland and WikiProject Australian crime.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? This particular topic has not been one of discussion in this course.