User talk:NikoSilver/Signature shop/DanDanRevolution

Who wouldn't love a sig?
... I would love one. :-P I really like your work, especially Onion's up there. I wonder if you can make one that matches my minimalist's tastes, perhaps highlighting the repetition in my username, and giving me a nice little talk arrow? If you did, I'd owe you "one" forever... (and ever)... Ehm... so thanks. --DanDanRevolution 02:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Will do. Wait a few days till I get an idea for you. What are your preferable colors?  N i k o S il v e r   (T) @ (C) 10:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm... my style is clean, minimalist... something that matches WP's style would be great :) some nice light blues and greys? something that doesn't stick out too much... :) thank you very much --DanDanRevolution 02:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Got it. Will do.  N i k o S il v e r   (T) @ (C) 14:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, thank you. --DanDanRevolution 15:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

It's kinda difficult not to stick out by using backgrounds. I messed around a little bit and I have made some first drafts. Pick one or two, so that we go from there. If you don't like anyone, let me know, and I'll keep scratchin' my head. Now let's see, how about...

...this:

D a nD a n Revolution(T)

...or this:

D a nD a n Revolution(T)

...or maybe you could mess around with the "revolution" thing, to make it more cosmopolitan:

D a nD a n Язvốλủçîðñ(T)

...do we have a basis to go on, or shall we wipe out the blackboard and start over? N i k o S il v e r  (T) @ (C) 20:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * hmm maybe not backgrounds but rather underlining? (a gradient, maybe?) i'm not a fan of the "cosmopolitan" (what the computer scientists in the room woud call l33t speak) could you try something more subtle than backgrounds?

Great. Smthng along these lines maybe:


 * 1)  D a n D a n Revolution(T)
 * 2) DanDan R ev ol ut io n (T)
 * 3)  D a n D a n  Revolution(T)
 * 4) DanDan  R ev ol ut  io n (T)
 * 5)  D a n D a n  Revolution (T)
 * 6) DanDan  R ev ol ut io n  (T)
 * 7) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)
 * 1) DanDan  R ev ol ut  io n (T)
 * 2)  D a n D a n  Revolution (T)
 * 3) DanDan  R ev ol ut io n  (T)
 * 4) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)
 * 1)  D a n D a n  Revolution (T)
 * 2) DanDan  R ev ol ut io n  (T)
 * 3) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)
 * 1) DanDan  R ev ol ut io n  (T)
 * 2) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)
 * 1) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)
 * 1) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)
 * 1) DanDan R ev ol ut  io n  (T)

Like'em? Any modifs? N i k o S il v e r  (T) @ (C) 14:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Niko I'm sorry to do this to you, but I don't think I want to use your sigs. They stand out more than I'd like, I'm sorry to have taken your time. :-/


 * Cool, no problem, although I liked the last underlined proposals and think they don't stand out so much, epecially #6. They are relatively short in code too. No problem though...  N i k o S il v e r   (T) @ (C) 08:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)