User talk:Nikolamilevski

Hello
Please do not move (rename) pages, as you did in Accession of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the European Union, to unsourced titles, especially when there are relevant guidelines in effect, and when there's a move discussion underway on the talkpage. Your full contributions list comprises of relevant repeated moves, which evidently suggests you're not a new user. Move-warring is harmful, especially in controversial issues such as the ones in question, and it is well-covered by the WP:3RR rule, which you are about to break. Your actions can also be regarded as a WP:POINT violation. NikoSilver 21:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ·ΚέκρωΨ· (talk) 20:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * The Burushaski-Balkans connection doesn't qualify for the language article, so it shouldn't been in the ethnic Burusho article. And anyway, Burushaski has been studied by Europeans for centuries, so any IE connection would have been noticed by now. Such claims need to be accepted in the field before we start including them here. kwami (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again,
 * I didn't mind the Macedonian connection to Burusho as long as both sides were presented. However, there are two Macedonian editors who insist on removing one side, claiming that presenting both sides in the FT article is somehow unbalanced. The last editor to do this said that presenting neither would also be acceptable. Since a balanced presentation is not acceptable to these two, and an unbalanced presentation is not acceptable to Wikipedia, the third choice is neither side. This fringe material really is irrelevant to the article anyway, as other editors have said. It's a matter of Macedonian politics. If anything, it belongs at Republic of Macedonia. kwami (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)