User talk:Nikolay83

Welcome!
Hello, Nikolay83, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Heart tattoo have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 18:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Heart tattoo
Hello there. This article you've created looks interesting, but there are no sources to support any of the content. Where did you find this information? &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 18:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. Sorry, it is my first article on Wikipedia. A have added the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikolay83 (talk • contribs)
 * No problem! No one is perfect when they first start here. Just know that verifiability is pretty important. I see you added an external link, but did not identify it as a source. Perhaps change the section heading to "References" instead of "External links". Someone else has also nominated the article for deletion. Don't take this personally. Unlike the PROD notice I added, the AfD notice has to remain there until the discussion at Articles for deletion/Heart tattoo is over. In the meantime, try to find more sources to show that the heart tattoo is deserving of an article apart from the parent article tattoo (or something else related). In my opinion the article reads well we just need more sources to establish that it is notable. See the general notability guideline for more information, and let me know if you need help! Best &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 19:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heart tattoo


The article Heart tattoo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Entirely unsourced, possible original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 19:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Heart tattoo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heart tattoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heart tattoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 19:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)