User talk:Nikomur

Welcome!

 * }

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Khridoli has been reverted. Your edit here to Khridoli was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://facebook.com/mtavari) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Black Shields


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Black Shields. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shavparosnebi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shavparosnebi - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. heather walls (talk) 08:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shavparosnebi
Thanks for creating Shavparosnebi, Nikomur!

Wikipedia editor Heatherawalls has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

"This may be copied from facebook, please be sure to re-summarize all of the content."

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Heatherawalls's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Shavparosnebi


The article Shavparosnebi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability shown by reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP  Boomer!   10:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Hi Nikomur! I removed the delete notice from Shavparosnebi because I added a couple of sources to your article. It really needs some more though. They don't have to be in english but they do have to be referenced in the article. Here is more information on referencing. heather walls (talk) 19:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Shavparosnebi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shavparosnebi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shavparosnebi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregJackP  Boomer!   03:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)