User talk:Nikosx4

First own response
Thank you so much! I'm glad to learn Wikipedia as an editor - it is pretty interesting and reminds me my past php/html coder experience. Also.. I have a few questions:

Cannot figure out how to connect the LSR template to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Latest_stable_software_release/PDF_Expert_(software). And what I need to update to make article indexable for search engines? Probably, it needs to be updated or improved. Thanks, Nikosx4 (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Nikosx4. What I'm guessing you want to do is add  to the  template at PDF Expert (software) - you want to show the latest release version of PDF Expert in the box at the top of the page, right? If that's so, just add  version number  somewhere within the infobox template (between   and the final  ). Yunshui 雲 水  14:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * As regards indexing, the page will be noindexed for (IIRC) 30 days after creation or until is is patrolled, whichever comes first. Yunshui 雲 水 14:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and conflicts of interest
I have reverted your edits to Readdle, as the tone used was completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a directory or an advertising platform. We strongly discourage users from editing areas in which they have a conflict of interest, for precisely this reason. We absolutely do not accept copy from the owners or directors of companies as being more "authoritative" than edits based on reliable sources.

Before you make any further edits to Wikipedia, please read the conflict of interest guidelines. In particular, note that you are in violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use if you edit articles about your employer as part of your job without disclosing this. See WP:PAID for details of how to make such a disclosure.

If you continue to add inappropriate advertising to Wikipedia regarding a subject with which you have a conflict of interest, you will be blocked from editing. Yunshui 雲 水 14:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (PDF Expert (software)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating PDF Expert (software), Nikosx4!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good work. However, page needs improvement."

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 03:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks,, I know that the page is not comprehensive and will be amended in future. The same for Readdle page. The last one has outdated information, however there is a revision with a fresh data but it objectively has a COI. Anyway, thanks for your attention and loyalty. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Nomination of Fluix for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fluix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fluix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanKity (talk) 02:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Nikosx4. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Readdle, or associated product pages such as PDF Expert (software) or Fluix, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fluix logo 2014.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Fluix logo 2014.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fluix-logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Fluix-logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)