User talk:Nikro


 * Welcome to my talk page. Be free to discuss and debate, but remember, no matter what, obey the rule.

RULE

And all debates should be said in it's category

AIC link and namespaces
Hello, I removed the link you placed on AIC. This is because on wikipedia we like to keep the 'article space', where the articles are, seperate from the other namespaces, like the Wikipedia namespace, where there is information about wikipedia. This is also why your 'article in construction' page was moved to 'wikipedia:articles in construction': it was moved from the article namespace to the wikipedia namespace. ssepp(talk) 14:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Blind Snakes
Hi. As a snake enthusiast, you may want to take some time to read and join WP:AAR and discuss your subject with fellow enthusiasts there. There are some well established conventions for article naming. The new article created by you does not follow the general convention and the content there will need to be moved to the pre-existing Blind snake, unless you can provide a rationale for the pluralization, capitalization and duplication. Also please note the paraphyletic nature of the group which makes the taxobox unsuitable for use. Shyamal 15:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

wikipedia is not a blog service
Just so you are aware, this journal will probably not survive in the long term. You could use one of the many free blog services on line. David D. (Talk) 19:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It's not a blog. It's just a branch to my userpage. §→Nikro 22:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Just bear in mind that if it expands significantly it may well be viewed as a blog. David D. (Talk) 23:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

ItIt's not supposed to be one, it's meant to have stupid stuff in it for people to look at when they come to my userpage. Sorry if it looks like a blog, I'll try not to make it look like one.

§→Nikro 02:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Please Remember This
This Talkpage is saperated into categories. Please place any comments in their category, not at the bottom. I will warn you if you submit a comment that is at the bottom and it should not be there, If you do it again, I will delete the message, You'll be informed, of course, along with a copy of the message. Thank You

§→Nikro 02:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Scientific Beliefs
A tag has been placed on Scientific Beliefs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 06:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review.   Rockpock  e  t  06:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

You can always work on it in your user space and get it into shape. I have to agree with the decision to make it into a redirect, it was very embryonic to dsay the least. David D. (Talk) 19:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC

It wasn't meant to be a redirect, it was on AIC meaning it is supposed to be the way it was, or incomplete, so other Wikipedians could edit it to completion, AIC isn't a redirection page, it's a help page, to provide the help of other wikipedians to complete articles that's submitted by users whom don't have the information to complete the article, if Scientific belief's topic is the same as Philosophy of science. then tell me, and Scientific Beliefs will be done for.
 * I have no idea what scientific beliefs are, I'll find out once your article is more coherent. With respect to the AIC stuff i do not understand your points above. Your explanation seems muddled, for example "meaning it was supposed to be the way it was"? And you try and explain the mechanism for the function of AIC with "to provide the help of other wikipedians to complete articles that's submitted by users whom don't have the information to complete the article" but how are these articles submitted? David D. (Talk) 02:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Am I missing something here? Isn't the entire point of Wikipedia that all articles are under construction? Just start an article and, the chances are, someone will come a long and collaborate with you. If you need expert help, there are templates you can use to attract attention (Template:expert) and Wikiprojects where you can work together with people with common interests. Having a page for general articles are under construction seems completely redundant to me. Rockpock  e  t  03:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * AIC can be helpful. And nothing is wrong with AIC, it follows the policys correctly, and it's lived throught two deletion tags, so appearantly same people find it's qualities unique or good enough. And for David D. if you mean, "How do you pot articles on AIC,"

the answer can be found at it page, Here.
 * No, I know how to list an article there but who will see it? Nothing links to that page. And as Rockpocket mention look at all the stubs that are already on wikipedia.  There is no reason an article has to be finished to be included.  However, you need to work on the style.  Your current scientific belief article is nothing but an outline, I assume that is why it was deleted.  Clearly this topic will be contested so even a good article might get deleted if i is deemed original research.  What are your sources? David D. (Talk) 03:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to find suitable place for links. anyone who want's to help search may. and i said that i needed to know if Scientific Beliefs is about the same topic as Philosophy of science, and if it was, I'd end it. so are their topics the same?


 * I have no idea if they are the same. Best place to ask is talk:Creationism or talk:Intelligent design. If you link your article to those talk pages then you may get some input too.  David D. (Talk) 04:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Nikro, I answered your post at the Village Pump, and removed the Stub tag from the article as you requested. I also left a couple suggestions at the Pump for how to improve the article...having verifiable sources is the most important part.
 * Regarding your attempts to create a Scientific Beliefs article: I think that one problem with the article is a "self-identity" issue. On Wikipedia we feel it's important that people and groups be allowed to define themselves. For example, if we have a bio of a person who claims to be a Christian, we have to report that they are a Christian, or at least that they refer to themselves as a Christian. We're not allowed to say "But they aren't a good Christian" or "Real Christians don't do what this person did".
 * By the same token, we have to accept scientists' definition of what Science is. And to a scientist, the word belief is absolutely the wrong word to use. Scientists observe phenomena, analyze data, and try to draw accurate conclusions from it. Belief never enters the picture. For a much better explanation of this, read Scientific method which is a good article on the subject; I hope it will answer some of your questions. Good luck and happy editing. Doc  Tropics  04:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Okey, hay, did anyone know that only 10-20% of the scientist believe in that scientific stuff [4.5 billion years ago and stuff like that.] the other 80-90% are other religions, and they have proof that this world is young, and all that stuff. Just wanted to mention it. Nikro 11:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of article in construction
Hello, I have proposed that article in construction be deleted. See Miscellany_for_deletion for the deletion discussion. ssepp(talk) 21:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandilism
Nikro Vandilised my user page, i say he should be banned.
 * These edits were in no way acceptable, no matter the context. Maybe some time off the PC would be helpful. Malc82 22:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree, Nikro. Not sure what you were thinking; you seem to be a productive editor, then out of the blue, you vandalize another user's page.  Not cool.  Please don't do it again. --barneca (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * He's my brother, and I told people why I done it on Wikidragons talk page.§→Nikro 14:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry to have to say this but I couldn't find the reason in the page's history, also are you 70.130.173.211, and finally your signature (which is what I, personally, think is the reason you vandalized) is published in a GNU Free Documentation License and therefore anyone can "copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially". Jeffrey.Kleykamp 21:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * My brother deleted the reason from his page, he told me about deleting it.


 * 1)First of all, I asked him if I can edit his page, he said "Go ahead." Then I asked him if he wanted the word "Yes" to be changed to "Neutral" or "Lost", he said "Which ever one".
 * 2)I was changing a lie he made about my work on wikiipedia.
 * 3)He tells to go ahead and edit it, then he deletes the reason for the changes on his talkpage, then he writes me up for vandelism, it looks like he set me up to get me banned, which he's known to do that. I say he should be banned for setting someone up for suspencen.
 * 4)If it was vandelism, Wikipedia would have noted it as vandelism, but they didn't.
 * 5)If he says "Go ahead", then he give me permission, thus it can't be vandelism, but what he's doing is vandelism to my charactor.

Trust me, he knewn about the reason on his talkpage, and he deleted it, and he told me. And I had permission from him to edit his page.Proove of my reason on hi's talkpage

This following is a copy from the user's talkpage history.


 * (cur) (last) 21:49, 8 June 2007 WikiDragon295 (Talk | contribs) (322 bytes)
 * (cur) (last) 11:46, 8 June 2007 Nikro (Talk | contribs) (531 bytes) (Won)

§→Nikro 10:55, 9 June 2007(UTC)

I did not give you permission, I said "Yeah, Ok" in a Sarcastic way, so it was NOT permission. And your excuse did NOT give you the right to change anything, neither the less, ADD something, or change my Signature! ¥→WikiDragon295 16:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The term Yeah, Ok is saying the same as sure, or idon't care, no matter how it is said

§→Nikro 18:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

There's a difference between sarcastic, and...NON-SARCARSTIC!!! ¥→WikiDragon295 19:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * (posted on both talk pages) If either one of you ever bother to stop whining at each other, and look above, you'll count three independent editors who took time they could have been using to deal with other things, dealing with you jokers instead. I don't know which is worse, the childish dicking around you're doing, or the fact that it didn't occur to either one of you that you are wasting other people's time.  Both of you please stay off my talk page until you've graduated Junior High School, at least.  Wikidragon, in particular, reporting someone as a vandal in bad faith is a good way to get banned for disruption. --barneca (talk) 00:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

About the Snake Project
Do you want the pictures on the main state page? Or in the actual snake's page? If on the main one, I suggest a table.

--Mooshykris 02:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

The states page. Thank you

§→Nikro 11:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Snakes please
Please help to expand the Snake Project. Alot of articles still need creating, and editting. More can be learned on the userpage.

Reply
I'm just dropping by to let you know that I replied to the comment you left on my talk page. In the future, it would be helpful to other users if you would sign comments you leave on talk pages by putting for tilde characters ( ~ ) at the end. This will be replaced by your username and and the date, which helps people keep track of who said what when. It looks like this: The Storm Surfer 13:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm just dropping by to let you know that I replied to your question on my talk page. -- Boracay Bill 05:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

re: Comments
Are you spying on me? I mean, no matter which discussion i make or git into, your there, and your envovled in everything I do, and everything envolving me, like AIC. §→Nikro 20:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I want to help make wikipedia the best it can be. As part of that, I pay attention to your actions, as is my right. ssepp(talk) 22:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Nobody assigns jobs on wikipedia. People volunteer where they think they can be useful (ideally). ssepp(talk) 22:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * What about WP:administrators? 23:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

re:link
It is here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article in Construction. ssepp(talk) 00:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

List of U.S. snakes
A "" template has been added to the article List of U.S. snakes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Realkyhick 00:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * First of all, please sign all your messages. "No Signature Given" doesn't make sense. Now the main point: If are intending to make a list of snake varieties by state, then the title needs to be changed to "List of U.S. snakes by state" or something similar. Having said that, such a list will be extremely difficult to maintain, and unless you are personally willing to do much of the work (as opposed to just putting up the empty shell and saying, "OK, folks, help me out here"), then it probably won;t go anywhere and will end up being deleted. I suggest doing it by regions instead, such as southeast, northeast, etc. Realkyhick 01:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Suit yourself, but like I said — unless you're willing to take on the research yourself, it's probably going to sit there as a barely-filled list for a while, and then it will be formally submitted as an article for deletion. Realkyhick 01:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, I see where you're going with this now. It makes a little more sense. I thought you were going to put the list of snakes for each state on this particular page, but now I see that you're breaking it out to a page per state. That's much better. However, there are still a couple of minor issues...


 * 1. To follow Wikipedia naming conventions, you should title each article "List of snakes in (state name)" instead of "List of (state name) Snakes." This will make it easier for people to find the article either with a search, in Wikipedia or with a search engine like Google, and people are more likely to come up with the correct title on their own when searching. 2. This project seems like it would be well-served with a navigational template that would put a list of state abbreviations in a box at the bottom of each page. I will tackle this template myself and post an example for you in the next day or two. You've seen this sort of thing before on Wikipedia articles, such as the ones at the bottom of the Snake article itself. In fact ... I just found an existing template that I could modify, so now is done. All you have to do is put  at the bottom of each page, and readers can navigate to any state list from any other. I just did it for Alabama and Arizona, and also moved the pages to new names to conform to the naming conventions. Realkyhick 15:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of snakes by state (U.S.), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 23:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Note that I did not delete it, I am not an admin. Corvus cornix 00:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=List_of_snakes_by_state_(U.S.)

You're welcome. Corvus cornix 01:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't you think that your old list was redundant with the template (see: at the bottom of each states lists of snakes? David D. (Talk) 15:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Master Mosquiton '99
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Master Mosquiton '99, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Master Mosquiton '99 seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Master Mosquiton '99, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Master Mosquiton '99
You don't explain why it's not notable at the moment and will probably be deleted. Here's a back up of your text.

This article is incomplete, please donate to this article what you can, I will be back to work on it some more after a good night's sleep.

Master Mosquiton '99, based on Akahori Satoru's popular OVA series, Master Mosquiton, is a Japanese vampire show about a girl named Hitoembore Inaho who's grandmother was in love with a vampire. Inaho appears to be a vampire expert and is obsessed with money. she meets a vampire at am all-girls Catholic high school. The series take's place in 1999, where as the original OVA series take's place in the 1920's. The location and story have changed as well. The beginning of every episode sarts off with the theme song The Power of Love and each episode ends with the song Chizu ni nai dekimasu. The series came out in 1997, and lasted for 9 volumes, 26 episodes.

Plot==

The beginning of the series starts with various wonders of the world just appearing out of nowhere and materializing in the middle of major cities. These wounders include The Easter Island stone heads and Noah's ark. The start of the series then takes place at an all-girl Catholic school, were Hitoembore Inaho, the most popular girl in school, is living her normal life. When schools out, Inaho returns to her home, were she thats amusement of the recent appearances in the major cities.

Later that day, a mystical circle appears in the middel of the Catholic school's courtyard. from the circle, a power vampire named Alucard Mosquiton appears in front of a school girl. Inaho hears what appears to be the girl screaming. Hoping out of her window, Inaho run over to the school and sees the school girl appearing to be hypnotised. Inaho finds sevrel other girls and the same condition as she searches for the vampire. She soon finds the vampire in a hall filled with school girls. Inaho throws holy water, crosses, bibles, and other objects at the vampire. The vampire doesn't appear to get any weaker, and soon his two guard elementals: Honoo, a fire elemental and Yuki, a snow and ice elemental, appear next to him. This soon leads to a chase at end at the top of a tower were Inaho finds a stake. The stake seems to be affective, and Mosquiton backs away, but when the two guards attackes Inaho, Mosquiton jumps forward into the stake, blocking the two attacks. The guards turn into kid versions of themselves. Inaho then sees a light outside the window, she grappes it and it becomes a beautiful dimand.

Inaho places the vampire into his coffin that he showed up in, she uses a drop of her own blood as the catalyst to revive him.

In the next episode, the revived Mosquiton becomes a history teacher at the Catholic school, were all the girls seems to be in love with him, probably an effect of his drinking of their blood. Inaho askes Mosquiton to follow her. She takes the vampire to a mystical circle, the same one that Mosquiton appeared from. In the circle, you can see a loin with a Metasoma, The creature leaves the circle and attacks the two. Inaho tells Mosquiton to defeat the creature. The battle leads to the creature entering the light coming from the circle. The lights about to take the creature to another deminson, until Inaho see a dimand, just like hers, in the beast's tail. Her greedy nature that over, and she justs enter the light, and taken away. Mosquiton and his guards go after her.

Inaho appears in a temple covered with sleeping creatures. She move towards a large door, but see a priceless object. She picks it up, and a large creature comes out of it, causing Inaho to throw the object. The noice wakes the other creatures, they start flying towards her. She manages to open, enter, then close the large door in time. Mosquiton soon comes to save her. Inaho see a large blue orb, which askes her if she wants to ask God anything. The orb end up telling her about O-Parts. Mystical objects that need an O-Key to be used. The loin creature shows up, as well as Mosquiton, and he attles the creature, and quickly kills it. The orb reveals to Inaho that the dimand she found in episode 1 was an O-Key, then the orb break, revealing an O-Part. Inaho uses the two together, only to find that the two are incompatable. The two cause a large explosion, and the temple and everything in it, starts disappearing, including Mosquiton, Inaho, Honoo, and Yuki. They hurry and finds the circle, enters it, and make it out of the deminsion.

O-Parts ==

O-Parts ===

O-Key ===

-- R OGER  TALK 08:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)