User talk:Nil Einne/Sandbox

Perhaps I've missed something but I suspect i haven't and this might be an example of you reading way too much into something innocent. I appreciate your unhappy over your block, but IMO this is part of the reason you get yourself into trouble, for whatever reason you seem to read way too much into a situation or comment.

Looking at some of the stuff you've said and continued to say, I wonder if you might still not understand what people are trying to tell you. AFAICT, no one questions that you can and have written some great content and we'd much rather you stick around and continue to do that. However, while Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia so does need great content and the editors who write it, it is also a collaborative project and so all editors need to be able to interact in an acceptable manner with other editors. This includes when there are disputes over their content. There's often dispute over how much leeway we should or do give to editors who behave poorly in interactions with other editors but write great content. But in any case, writing great content is eventually not going to be enough for your fellow editors (including admins) to ignore problematic behaviour. In other words if the problem is the poor way you interact with other editors in certain areas, editors supporting a block are not doubting your content contributions. It isn't that they feel your content contributions are unwelcome or don't improve the project. Instead it's because they feel such contributions, no matter how welcome they are and how much they improve the project; they're not enough to make up for the harms the problems you have in interacting with other editors cause for the functioning of a collaborative project.