User talk:Nillarse

Suspected Socks
This is easier to read with bullet points: See also discussion of this user here. --Boston (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * When User:William M. Connolley semi-protected Rice and beans, User:69.118.72.18 (edit history) couldn't edit it.
 * Another editor (User:jheiv) reverted to my version until User:Nillarse (edit history) reverted back to User:69.118.72.18's version instead.
 * Both these accounts have suspicious overlap history with month old account of User:ProfXY (edit history).
 * User:69.118.72.18 is obviously User:Nillarse (reverting back to old version that has the outdated "merge tag" etc.).
 * User:Nillarse is apparently User:ProfXY as among their very few edits both have edited Dreadlocks, Hamitic, and Moors with similar style.
 * (at Talk:Rice and beans) ...I will report you for vanderlism...Learn more on the topic and stop vanderlizing with you opinions 69.118.72.18 (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * (at User talk:Wildhartlivie) ...spare me the non sense with the vanderlism crap because I'm not and your not the 1st person who goes around "crying" I'll report vanderlism just because someone write something they disagree with...Get your facts straight before I report YOU for unsourced information and vadalism. ProfXY  21:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * See also Sockpuppet investigations/ProfXY/Archive

Sock block
You're a sock. You can stay blocked until you decide you want to talk William M. Connolley (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Let me guess, you and this other editor you have teamed up with claim I'm a "sock" but did Wiki check to see if I was indeed a sockpuppet or did you just decide to block me on our own when your friend asked? Also talk to you about what? If you wanted to talk then you would have contacted me to and not jump to conclusion or allow yourself to be used by someone to do their bidding. Just because you are an admin does not mean you can do whatever you want. It's a shame I didn't know Wiki was about being bullied into accepting someone’s opinion on a subject especially when there is no evidence or historical account or source to even back it up. Luckily there more sensible administrator out there. Nillarse (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

DON'T BOTHER TRYING TO REASON WITH FOOLS ITS SIMPLE CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.72.18 (talk) 05:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thought there were greater minds on wiki didn't think it was a power trip where editors got lap-dogs to do their work for them, I could have just done that but didn't feel the need to do it since I knew I did nothing wrong in the 1st place, but I guess I might have to Nillarse (talk) 05:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

{unblock reviewed|1=Was wrongfulling acused of being a sock puppet (some thing that was not reported to or verified by wiki) by the admin who blocked my account William M. Connolley and his editor friend boston who had been making changes to the article rice and beans getting into edit wars and adding false and non citated information. The editor boston who got this admin to block me also got another editor jheiv to make changes for him. luckily jheiv found out he was being used admitted that he did not know about the subject on the artiles talk page and stoped editing. the editor boston and the admin William connolley need to be looked at. There is absolutely no reason for my account to be suspended.|decline=WP:NOTTHEM, as well as failure to assume good faith and making the classic sockpuppet argument of "why wasn't this checkusered"? Well, we don't need checkuser when we've got these edit histories. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)}}

The editor boston who got the Admin friend to suspend my account is now claiming my account is 3 days old (now he changed it to a month). What is the reason for the lies? Clearly my account has been open for months now. It doesn't make sense if I was truly a sock puppet why wasn't it reported to wiki so, it should have been proven and properly dealt with. Instead of his editor friend just abusing his power to block me. All these accounts should be looked at, and the I.P addresses should be traced. I only have one account which is this one and I have nothing to hid. I think Boston and his editor friend should be looked into.Nillarse (talk) 15:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)