User talk:Nilotpal Dhakal

Proposed deletion of Dr.Narayan Dhakal
Hello, Nilotpal Dhakal. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dr.Narayan Dhakal, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dr.Narayan Dhakal to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,  Ish dar  ian  08:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Narayan Dhakal


A tag has been placed on Narayan Dhakal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. The-Pope (talk) 14:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Please help us by improving this article:
 * Articles require
 * significant coverage
 * in reliable sources
 * that are independent of the subject.


 * Significant coverage
 * We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
 * Reliable sources 
 * We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
 * Independent
 * Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.

A useful search tool--Wikipedia Reference Search Dloh cierekim  22:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)