User talk:NimNick

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 15:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please read WP:3RR and use caution in your editing. You have reverted the List of scientists opposing global warming consensus page a number of times this evening. Vsmith 01:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Warnings warning
Please do not add bogus warning messages to peoples pages. You are, undoubtedly, frustrated by your failure to persuade a majority to your views. But this action won't help you William M. Connolley 20:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Majority? Wikipedia is no democracy. You should read the help pages. --NimNick 20:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Indeed, wiki is not a democracy. But my statement stands; you haven't persuaded anyone William M. Connolley 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

There was no need to persuade Arcer or Childholds End. LOL --NimNick 21:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Bogus warning messages
Hi Nick!

Please stop putting bogus warnings onto peoples talk pages if they revert your inapproriate edit to List of scientists opposing global warming consensus. Such a change would not even constitute vandalism if your edits were justifiable. As your edits are unsourced nonsense, it might be argued that your repeated edits constitute vandalism, of course. --Stephan Schulz 20:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)