User talk:Nimbley66

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Hello, Nimbley66, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Luk suh  16:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Huntington Beach and Kilmarnock
Your addition to Huntington Beach, California, claiming Kilmarnock to be a sister city, requires a proper reference as the cited source does not mention it. You have repeated added this information without citing your sources, which constitutes vandalism. Kristopher, please desist or cite your source. Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 20:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Alanraywiki (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:101 0574.jpg
Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Laigh Kirk
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 20:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

To offer specifics, your latest contributions to Laigh Kirk may be summed up as containing the following: I welcome your edits and admire your perseverance, but please read Wikipedia's Five pillars and consider its tenets while you edit. Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 23:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * A parish church infobox that appears to have been taken from a Catholic parish, then altered with information (including a redlinked misspelling of the word Protestant) but leaving inaccurate information behind. I suspect that a Protestant church is not affiliated with Roman Catholicism.
 * Non-notable and tangential information about nearby restaurants.
 * An uncited statement that implies the building dates from 1410, when the cited source (and at least one other online resource) state the 1600s.
 * A "popular culture" section about a film that has zero Google references, which makes me suspect a hoax. Adding to my suspicion, at least one edit included a self-mention of one "Kristopher Nimbley". Given your history   of this sort of behaviour (under different user accounts, also a violation of Wikipedia policy), this can only be viewed as vandalism.

England
Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Statuekillie.jpg
Hi Nimbley66!

We thank you for uploading Image:Statuekillie.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Crosskilmarnock.jpg
Hi Nimbley66!

We thank you for uploading Image:Crosskilmarnock.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Head4354.jpg
Hi Nimbley66!

We thank you for uploading Image:Head4354.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Uk cloud 08041418.jpg
Hi Nimbley66!

We thank you for uploading Image:Uk cloud 08041418.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock
I have nominated Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  LegoTech &middot;(t)&middot;(c) 15:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

File:101 0574.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:101 0574.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 17:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

File:101 0576.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:101 0576.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 17:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)