User talk:Nimbus58

Best Medical
Ondraf/niras did not take over the company. like the reference you provided stated. there was nobody to take over the company. and niras/ondraf became responsible for it. I don't know what your issue is with the text. But i suggest you modify it to what you think is correct. rather than just removing the section all together. The main point for the sentences is to note locations that ondraf has under its management. It may have a better place in a seperate section, possibly in a section called "sites" but this is definitely valid information. and there is nothing wrong with the sentence as is.

"l’ONDRAF a repris la gestion des installations de Best Medical Belgium S.A. qui n’ont pas trouvé de repreneur." is not the same as "Best Medical Belgium was taken over by ONDRAF/NIRAS " which is categorically false. ANd in either case this information belongs in the article.

Just blanking the sentence is not constructive.
 * Oh i think i see what your objection is, It says "Belgoprocess" at the star, and it may be more accurate to say ondraf/niras. Instead of its subsidiary. Though I'd be surprised if it wasn't belgoprocess actually doing the work. Anyway, I'll make that distinction clear after the 3RR expires, unless you have more objections.Pinfix (talk) 09:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Exactly, ONDRAF/NIRAS is in charge of the ex- Best Medical Belgium, not Belgoprocess. The staff at the "Site ONDRAF Fleurus" as it is now known is a mix of ONDRAF staff and some ex-employees of BMB. Belgoprocess has nothing to do with it until some waste will need to be treated. For your information, I work at ONDRAF and just discovered the page. (I am new to working with Wikimedia). --Nimbus58 (talk) 10:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying this, I was probably a bit too quick when i wrote that. I have added it to its own section and corrected Belgoprocess with ondraf/niras. Let me know if you have other objections.
 * And welcome to wikipedia. Since you work for ONDRAF you may want to read WP:COI or more simply Plain and simple conflict of interest guide as a guide. You will notice that it discourages you from editing these articles directly, instead it suggests you comment on the talk page. While i don't interpret this too strictly (others might), In any case i will keep an eye on the talk page in case there are any issues. Cheers.Pinfix (talk) 10:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the changes and apologies for my "unbecoming conduct". I will read and learn.--Nimbus58 (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)