User talk:Ninabeena

January 2022

 * Hi - i've noted in the talk page for Maria Shriver and in my edit notes for Maria Shriver and on this talk page nearly a year ago that your edits seem poorly cited and inaccurate. Your inaccurate edits have continued and your edits on Jan 3 2022 to Maria Shriver were so clearly fabricated that i'm considering it vandalism. While your account has nearly a year of history of this kind of behaviour, i'm considering this your first official warning before requesting Administrator intervention.

January 2021
Hello, I'm RedPanda25. I noticed that you recently removed content from Maria Shriver without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Just because the relationship is over doesn't mean it should be deleted from the article. You can add a sourced line after it saying that the relationship is over.'' RedPanda25 23:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Feb 2021
Hi! i'm JaredUram I'm noticing your content changes and not seeing adequate references or justifications for the changes. Can we perhaps address the changes you'd like to see on the talk page for Maria Shriver? Thanks,

Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Matthew Dowd, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! HaeB (talk) 11:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2023
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)