User talk:Ninalba

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vojsava Tripalda, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vojsava Tripalda was changed by Ninalba (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86266 on 2011-04-12T18:39:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vojsava Tripalda, you may be blocked from editing. WhiteWriter speaks 21:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Vojsava Tripalda. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WhiteWriter speaks 21:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Stub tag
Hi, Ninalba. Yesterday, you were repeatedly removing Serbia-stub from Vojsava Tripalda. If you don't mind my asking, why were you doing this? Perhaps it's because you believe that Vojsava was ethnically Albanian and not Serbian. Well, I've only become even vaguely familiar with this topic in the last couple of weeks, but it seems that sources are split on her ethnicity. As such, this article is of relevant to both editors interested in Serbian topics and editors interested in Albanian topics. And really, the stub tags are only used for editor-oriented purposes, like stub categorization. Rest assured that the presence of the Serbia stub tag does not reflect a passage of judgment on Vojsava's ethnicity. So, I'm go to add the stub tag back in within 24 hours, unless you have any questions. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ninalba, removing the template without comment again, which you did here, is unacceptable. Please refrain from reverting again and instead discuss the issue here or on the talk page. See Editing policy. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 04:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been reported
Unfortunately, nothing else helped... That kind of editing is not acceptable on Wikipedia. You have been reported on the WP:AN3. -- WhiteWriter speaks 18:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Kuru  (talk)  00:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing, specifically repeatedly deleting the same information from the same article. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Donika Kastrioti, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A Macedonian, a Greek. (talk) 05:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Reverts
Bëhet mos të bësh kaq shumë reverte?.-- — ZjarriRrethues — talk 23:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC) Giorgio Castrioti ishte Katolik. Stop with the lies.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for continuation of long term edit war from before your last block. If you continue like this, there is a danger that you may be blocked indefinitely, so I strongly urge you to think carefully about changing your editing pattern when this block expires. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)