User talk:Nineguru

February 2024
Hello, I'm Ertal72. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nautamlal Bhagavanji Mehta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ertal72 (talk) 03:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * i am new to editing . have massive info to update wiki with compelling evidence but not good at worlsdpress or understad the editing platform. i apologies for my mistake.i may have to take some profesinal help to update.www.nautamlalmehta.com  please do not block me Nineguru (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * i am new to editing . have massive info to update wiki with compelling evidence but not good at worlsdpress or understad the editing platform. i apologies for my mistake.i may have to take some profesinal help to update.www.nautamlalmehta.com  please do not block me Nineguru (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mahatma. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ertal72 (talk) 04:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Nautamlal Bhagavanji Mehta, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Ertal72 (talk) 04:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * i am new to editing . have massive info to update wiki with compelling evidence but not good at worlsdpress or understad the editing platform. i apologies for my mistake.i may have to take some profesinal help to update.www.nautamlalmehta.com  please do not block me Nineguru (talk) 04:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. &#39;&#39;Flux55&#39;&#39; (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Johnuniq (talk) 05:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * please dont block me you look at my attached web site. I tried to update wrong info on display at wiki without any evidece or documents. i just tried to update it. any way i am not good and have no self pramotion or advertiesement. before you judge me please spend a few minutes on my effort and work.I have been with Wiki over 20 years. do bot block please. Nineguru (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please try to see how to request an unblock at Appealing a block &#39;&#39;Flux55&#39;&#39; (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)