User talk:NinetailedfoxBrianna

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Art LaPella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Art LaPella (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Art LaPella, you may be blocked from editing. Art LaPella (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thomas Aquinas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Thomas Aquinas was changed by NinetailedfoxBrianna (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908818 on 2011-02-20T00:50:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Pierre Plantard, you may be blocked from editing. SQGibbon (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --John (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)