User talk:Ninetoyadome/Archives/ 2013/December

Guba Mass grave
Your actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account in Guba mass grave as you are not allowed to put one sided information and therefore let this to be warning. You have already have track of vandalism like in here in here, by adding president over athlete's name http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics&diff=prev&oldid=230913536

In the second attempt, admins will ban you for this type of actions.--NovaSkola 16:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive772
Please do not add comments to archived discussions. I have reverted your edits to Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive772. If you need to, please start a new discussion. Regards, GiantSnowman 08:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * FYI - I have blocked ; a full list of suspected sockpuppets can be found at - please let me know if you find any more. GiantSnowman 08:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Firstly you should tag the user page, not the talk oage. Secondly a block and a ban are two different things. Thirdly, no, tagging doesn't result in a block - try AIV or SPI. I have now blocked Qajik. Regards, GiantSnowman 17:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

re Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast
You have to specify on the talk page the POV problems you see. Otherwise, the notice will be removed. --Golbez (talk) 19:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Justice for Khojaly
You have to specify on the talk page the POV and Refimprove problems you see (this was already explained to you above by other user). Therefore your notice has just been removed from the article Justice for Khojaly. Best, 195.212.29.185 (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Let us see first if the necessary changes will be made. We can go from there. Proudbolsahye (talk) 00:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit war on Ben Yagan
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Ben Yagan.

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Ben Yagan or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 12:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Please notice the vanalism of 75.37.64.38 on other pages. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 12:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Soghomon Tehlirian
Hi,

You have removed the section below I have entered to Soghomon Tehlirian which is a fact, and reference was made to armenews.com

Could you please state on what basis you have decided to remove this ?

even though his release by German court on murder of Talat Pasha based on his insanity. Malizengin (talk) 03:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Why would that part even be significant? Ninetoyadome (talk) 03:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

You are right to remove it from there as it sounds bit offensive in complete sentence. But in general, this information is important on summary of the article where it relays all the information in summary, leading events and results etc. Thanks, Malizengin (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC) You removed another edit there, mentioning it is mentioned in trial section, everything there in summary is mentioned later in details. But summary is where all important aspects of the article should be outlined. It is mentioned there court released him. But court released him on insanity and not on basis court didn't find him innocent. Don't you agree ? Please before removing and we spend time discuss. I am being constructive while you are not showing same positive attitude, thanks, Malizengin (talk) 07:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide
You have reverted below sections without any basis,

{ Austin Henry Layard's confidential report which was sent on 25th March 1878 with reference number of 401, states.... }
 * A book written by same person might say Armenians massacred. But the section I entered is about living conditions of Armenians in 1878. Section I entered is official British document, all reference number and date and reference is given. So it is correct therefore I appreciate either you give reasonable and logical reason for removing or please undo,

Another part you have removed is

{Report of Charles Blunt, British Consul to Ottoman Empire gives more light to life of Armenians under Ottoman Rule, the report is dated 1860, .....}


 * Please explain why you have removed this part ? it is again official British documents. You may like or not what is written there, but document is a document and it is relevant to topic and will be helpful making research on the subject.

Either please give the reasons -not subjective but objective- and if you don't have reasons please undo to prevent edit war and further claims.


 * Post the "confidential" report. I can't find this report online, somehow the author is the only one who has it? Countless eyewitness reports state Armenians were treated as second class citizens. Ninetoyadome (talk) 07:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

it is from a book with ISBN 975-16-0139-8 and page numbers are indicated. You don't find it online doesn't mean it is not real. You should pay and buy books. This article has lots of references to webpages which can be written by anybody. This is a book prepared based on real documents with all reference numbers to original documents. You may consult to UK archives or http://kohatest.univ-aix-marseille.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=335674 for the book. If you don't have any more reasons, could you please undo you revert of changes ?Malizengin (talk) 07:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

insane accusations of insanity
I could care less if Soghomon Tehlirian was excused on the grounds that he was insane. But no where in his trial record does it say he was deemed innocent on the grounds of insanity: Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement warning: WP:ARBAA2
This warning is for edit-warring and non-neutral editing, as discussed in response to a recent arbitration enforcement request.  Sandstein  06:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

AE report
He's already topic banned for six months and that's just for edit-warring. It is just a matter of spending our time and energy to file an AE to further his sanctions. Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Go ahead reverting it. If people has objections they can express their opinions in the already opened topic in the talk page. Proudbolsahye (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Turns out the ANI report has been archived. Would you want to reapply? Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Report him just like how ShadowCrow reported him at ANI... Proudbolsahye (talk) 04:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)