User talk:Ning-ning/Archive 1

Speedy deletion of Heathley Park
A tag has been placed on Heathley Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Newfoundpool"
A page you created, Newfoundpool, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:


 * No content. Any article consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.d ela noy gabs adds  17:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Dane Hills has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Template:Areas of Leicester. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Two One Six Five Five  τʃ 17:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Honey, I've just re-vandalised it.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Now then...user 21655 objected to the deletion of Heathley Park from the Template: Areas of Leicester  (didn't actually link to an article), and defined this as vandalism. 21655 then reverts the template to a previous state, removing a further edit which linked to Newfoundpool, User Realkyhick then defined this addition of a link to a then-existing article as a "last warning" case of vandalism. The article was deleted, but has now been re-created. Ning-ning requests that someone disruptively edit the Leicester Areas template to restore a link to Newfoundpool, and then self-admonish themselves.


 * My bad. I mis-read the history "diff" page. Of course, saying you "just re-valdalised it" is kind of a tip-off, so you might want to avoid that from now on. It might give someone the wrong impression. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Salcombe church.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Salcombe church.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 19:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Clayworth
A tag has been placed on Clayworth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyRy5  talk  16:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have declined the speedy - the page is fine. TerriersFan (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

info box
Hi, good to see you adding info boxes to villages/towns, you are putting postcode_district = DN22 8DF but it should not include the inward part of the postcode only the outward ie DN22 or it will not show. Also I see you are not putting the post town, dialling code or District these are easy to find on the web, the post town should in in the standard format as Template:Infobox UK place ie DONCASTER  regards Palmiped (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have been deleting the coor title tag as the infobox appears to overwrite this and produce a double image- I presume this is correct? Yes I have had to do same. If you are looking for village/town images to put in the infobox I have used this site Geograph British Isles as the images are Creative Commons licence so can be uploaded Palmiped (talk) 23:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi again for postcode district to show in info box you also need to have the postcode_area= ie NG. regards Palmiped (talk) 12:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi,You have put wrong info in infobox for Widmerpool it shows Newark & Sherwood when it should be Rushcliffe, also you have wiki linked St Halena in West Leake without checking where link linked to in this case an island in the South Atlantic, please be more careful Palmiped (talk) 23:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice addition
to Stonton Wyville. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Bitteswell
Hi Ning-ning, my only real interest in Vulcans was the crash at RAF Syerston in 1958 as I witnessed the crash. cheers Palmiped (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Derbyshire infoboxes
Look great! Well done and so fast? Can you do a 100? :-) Victuallers (talk) 08:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow ... you may get RSI! Is it possible that you could add the two lines to support a top picture in an infobox .... called "static image". (See Elvaston). Don't worry if its tricky. I am getting tempted to add pics to complement your work. Hope you are not offended. These articles look much better with infoboxes. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey I wasnt suggesting retracing your steps (although you obviously can if you wish) you are doing a great job. I thought that if you had a standard bit to cut and paste then you may as well include the static image bit in any further infoboxes you do. Anyway .... activity is up on the derbyshire villages by others I notice .... I think your additions are getting others interested in improving too. So excellent contributions. Victuallers (talk) 19:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Oh which is the ugliest village? Victuallers (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

User Wikipedian For|year=2006|month=5|day12
Added date of your first edit - hope this is OK --palmiped | Talk  20:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)