User talk:Niniworld09

Welcome!

Hello, Niniworld09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Megan Brooks, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Megan Brooks


The article Megan Brooks has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tina R. Brooks


A tag has been placed on Tina R. Brooks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. De728631 (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Megan Brooks for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Megan Brooks, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Megan Brooks until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. De728631 (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

More inappropriate page creations
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kristine Williams, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Tina R. Brooks, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. —  Jeff G. ツ  21:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Kristine Williams. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. ” TęĻęŞ  (PT @ L C G) 21:58, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kristine Williams


The article Kristine Williams has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.
 * The sources provided cannot be found.” TęĻęŞ  (PT @ L C G) 22:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what the deal is with Kristine Williams, Kristine Rispi, and the other such articles you've been creating, but they appear to be copied from legitimate articles with the names changed. As far as I can tell, you are making up content about a fictional wrestler, your friend, or something similar. Whatever it is, it's not a legitimate article; it's into the realm of hoaxes and other intentional attempts to deceive. You are welcome to explain who Williams or Rispi is here on your talk page, and if she's verifiable, another editor will assist you in creating an article. However, do not create another article on Williams or any similar wrestler; any such creation will lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 22:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of WWE Diva Production Theme
A tag has been placed on WWE Diva Production Theme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 23:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)