User talk:Nintenchris5963

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mikagura School Suite. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Dream Eater Merry. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dream Eater Merry. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 22:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: Angel Beats!
Yuri is not officially called a "protagonist" in reliable sources, so please do not do edits like this calling her one.--  十  八  03:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Golden Time (novel series)‎. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. --  十  八  23:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nintenchris5963 making threats. —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making threats against another editor. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Why I'm threatening TheFarix?

 * And seeing this edit here:, that six months now ends 2/1/18. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: Why I'm threatening TheFarix?
You need to convince us that you absolutely can control yourself in the future. You seem to be trying to convince us that you cannot control yourself and so should be left blocked. --Yamla (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Waited for 6 + 2 = 8 months has passed.

 * Assuming that you have in fact completed the standard offer without a single attempt at evading your block for six months (I'll obviously want a checkuser to verify and give me a thumbs-up), I'm not opposed to unblocking you under the guideline. Boing! said Zebedee will also need to respond and give his blessing before I consider it.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * CU results did not reveal any socking. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I am a believer in giving editors another chance in situations such as this, so am willing to unblock you. Normally, like Oshwah, I would wait for the blocking administrator, User:Boing! said Zebedee, to express an opinion, but he is away from Wikipedia for a while, so it might be a very long wait, and he has also said that while he is away he is happy for any administrator to reverse his actions without consulting him, so I shall go ahead and unblock you. Please do be careful about what you say in future, as I hope you won't be blocked again. (Also if you were to be blocked again for the same reason, the likelihood of your then being unblocked would be much lower than this time.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Golden Time (novel series), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Aria the Scarlet Ammo. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Monthly Girls' Nozaki-kun. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Sockpuppet investigation
—Farix (t &#124; c) 00:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've been mimicked. That user is trying to get me blocked again. But I hate to admit, but I do agree with him, though. Nintenchris5963 (talk) 01:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)