User talk:Nintendork15

September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wario (franchise) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wario (franchise) was changed by Nintendork15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876576 on 2018-09-13T18:20:06+00:00

Nintendork15, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Super Mario Odyssey. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Super Mario Odyssey was changed by Nintendork15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911544 on 2018-09-14T21:47:48+00:00

September 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Princess Peach, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization Talk  17:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at World War Blue.  General Ization Talk  17:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Princess Daisy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 17:41, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

And in the edit summaries and  ... probably others. You need to start listening to what other editors are telling you.  General Ization Talk  18:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps an admin will see it differently (apparently not), but I still don't think you get it. To all indications, this has nothing to do with not "looking at the right sources". As far as I can tell, you weren't looking at any sources; you were sharing with us your personal observations, opinions and theories. Consequently, you had no sources to look at, or to cite with the content you were adding. Citation of reliable sources for content you add is not optional, especially once challenged.  General Ization Talk  18:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

i promise to actually give sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendork15 (talk • contribs)

Again, the admin is the one who needs to be satisfied, but if it was me I'd require you to go one step further: to promise to stop adding any content that cannot be reliably sourced, such as your own observations, opinions and theories (unless a reliable source makes the same observation). (To any article, not just the ones related to your block.)  General Ization Talk  18:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

great. so i either have to delete my account or quit wikipedia forever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendork15 (talk • contribs)

If you're only interested in expressing your own opinions (rather than those of published sources) here, then I suppose you're right. That isn't what we've said, however.  General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 18:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

sorry. i just got mad. so how do i get the admin pleased? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendork15 (talk • contribs)

Start at the top of this section and read what we've told you. If you still don't get it, it's probably best you remain blocked. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 18:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

i think i'll just wait for the ban to expire. afterwards i'll try not to be disruptive again. if i do though, i apologize in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendork15 (talk • contribs)

Admin, please consider an extension. I don't think we were asking too much, but apparently the editor does. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 18:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

5 unblock requests are too many
It's disruptive to continue making unblock requests when you have unanswered unblock requests. It calls into question your maturity and your ability to partake in a collaborative environment.

I'm not willing to unblock you unless you can assure us that you will make no more unsourced edits. You must further assure us that you will not edit solely based on your own opinions or observations. If you continue with the unsourced edits after your bock expires, you may find yourself blocked for longer than 31 hours.

If you'd stopped with the unblock request that implied understanding these points, I'd have unblocked you. Now I don't feel comfortable doing so. -- <b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Considered and rejected. We will see. -- <b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Peach 76.png
Thanks for uploading File:Peach 76.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 20:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)