User talk:NipokNek

Removal of user from WP:AIV
Yes, I believe that's okay as long as you put in the edit summary why you are doing so :) Josh Holloway  15:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Having said that, why would you want to? I may have re-warned the IP user but I didn't report them. Your report is the only one that stands! Josh Holloway  15:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, he's currently not violating, and there's nothing more to be done if he stops now. NipokNek 15:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Chavela
Hi. Yeah, it did look like a bad edit. :-) However, Cerveza preparada is currently a very weak stub, as is Chavela, and I am merging the two articles together for now. Hopefully, they can be expanded in the future, and then split the article apart in the future. It seems better to consolidate the two for now, rather than nominate both for deletion.  Michelada is a very well developed article by comparison. -- Willscrlt  (  Talk &middot; Cntrb  ) 09:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yea, well... :) All these bots lately are making me a bit trigger-happy. It's getting so annoying to spends several minutes writing up why you reversed someones edit only to find that all your work went into the bit bucket cause some bot beat you to it. NipokNek 09:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ha-ha. Yeah, I've experienced that myself. I've stopped watching the recent changes. I find more than enough vandalisms and other problems in my watchlist without having to watch that anymore. A lot of things slip through the cracks. Thanks for keeping an eye on things. :-) -- Willscrlt (  Talk &middot; Cntrb  ) 10:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 23:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Lizzie Harrison's pages
Why do you have a problem with me making NCIS episode pages?Lizzie Harrison 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Since there is already a page listing all of the episodes, it seems redundant. But like I said, I didn't think it was obviously wrong, so I left it up to those who would know better than I. NipokNek 18:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying your opinion but each episode page has quotes, cast notes and extra info and trivia that would make the list of episode page no longer a list but an indiscrimante list of information.Lizzie Harrison 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Extra Speedy Boxes on SharedXpertise - Shared Services and BPO Thought Leadership
I don't think so. If the editor is interested in working on the article, I think it's only fair to give him or her notice that there are other issues that need to be addressed. It would be a shame if he or she spent a lot of time to weed out the spam and make it encyclopedic only to have it deleted for WP:CORP or copyvio. IMHO. -- Butseriouslyfolks 19:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Nepassa
I'm not trying to accuse you of anything here, but it seems to me like you think that I made up my own religion. Since my entire family are Nepacs and I have several books on the religion, I think I know what I'm talking about. You're just the sort of person I'm trying to educate about my religion. Thank-you for proposing your edit anyway, I'm sure you only meant well. Moo kau 19:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Please keep the discussion on the Talk Page of the article, where everyone can see it and comment. NipokNek 20:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The last time it was deleted, it was deleted because of too little context, now there is too much "information" to use this reasoning again (I put a template on it), I am looking at dispute resolution policy now.  Mr.Z-man  talk  20:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks
Reacted at User_talk:Shawnborgia--BozMo talk 11:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Re. Stumbling all over myself.
Oh. I reverted it because the user had replaced the warning with "wow". Looked like plain vandalism. Regards, Hús  ö  nd  21:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The "wow" must have been edited some how, but if you look, it was there all along. I can see how it would have looked new. NipokNek 21:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi
I'm making just a redirecting out of the micro-article, so the fast deleting tag has no point. --Damifb 08:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've taken the tag back off. NipokNek 08:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks man, I'm used to the Spanish Wikipedia, and therefore I'm amazed at how fast you guys react here, there is so much more people. But the redirecting doesn't seem to work... can you help me with that?

--Damifb 08:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Done. NipokNek 08:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh! of course! THAT'S how it is done. I should know. LOL.--Damifb 08:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I know nothing, except how to find stuff. If you ever forget how to do something, just go look for an example, in this case, I looked at the redirect Dr Who. :) NipokNek 08:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Removal of warning at User talk:Arem04667
I'm sorry It didn't cross my mind. I was reviewing his activity and just didn't see it in contribs. So I thought it was placed there by mistake. I'm sorry about that.--Pethr 22:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Apologies
Actually, I thought you'd missed leaving the warning! You'll appreciate that not every new pages patroller is anything like as thorough as you are, and many don't leaving warnings. My apologies! Keep up the great work. Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Some of us actually take the time to leave Welcome banners as well as warnings, so it takes more than thirty seconds to do. NipokNek 11:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The firstarticle template combines features of "welcome" with a "speedy deletion warning". It might be useful. There's also a badbio template which has a "Wikipedia is not myspace" sort of message. Hope this helps, Angus McLellan (Talk)


 * Only helpful if I valued speed over being specific. My edit to Corrina was at 11:13. Your warning tag on User talk:Jaredmarc was at 11:14. That's just a bit too fast if you ask me. NipokNek 11:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I seem to be stepping on your toes again. I saw your note at WP:AN about Latina Aragon, and, like you, found that it was a copyvio. Anyway, I've put things back the way they were, so now there's only one db-copyvio tag, etc. One option is to add copyvio as well, and blank the page, apart from the tags. I've never bothered doing this for blatant copies [but I think we've already agreed that I'm lazy], but there seems no reason why you couldn't do that if you wanted to be thorough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I usually use that one for inclusion of copyright information into already created pages. (The review process seems to take days with that tag, and this qualifies for an outright speedy.) Thanks for letting me know tho, I hadn't seen your edits till you mentioned them, so you must have reverted them awfully quickly. NipokNek 13:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

AllYourWords is notable?
Hello NipokNek. I was about to put a speedy tag on this page, but then I saw that you had removed yours. Can you tell me what it was that made you hesitate? Currently there does not seem to be any claim of notability, and the article itself is hopeless. (Says nothing, basically). EdJohnston 01:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I removed it not so much because I thought it was notable, but because I realized I wasn't going to be able to put in the proper legwork to be sure a speedy was warranted. NipokNek 09:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Via Galactica
The article was NOT complete! I clicked on "show preview" and Wikipedia saved the page instead. Now I must start from scratch because you were so hasty to remove it. Next time please check an editor's history before assuming the worst and acting rashly. Thank you. SFTVLGUY2 15:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I did not delete your article, I mearly tagged it as the copyright violation that it was. Your history as an editor had no bearing on whether the text was copied from a website. NipokNek 15:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I took your advice and looked at your edit history. It seems you removed the warning from your talk page - not the actions of someone who's motives are as pure as you would have me believe. NipokNek 15:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have every right to edit my talk page as I see fit. Since your accusation of copyright violation was false and extremely premature, given the article clearly wasn't complete, I see no reason to keep it on display. SFTVLGUY2 16:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * If you dispute the deletion, take it up with the Administrator who deleted it. You accuse me of falsly and prematurly tagging your page as a Copyright Violation. Let us examine those two points. Since I am not an Administrator, that means that at least one other person agreed with me that your original page was, in fact, a violation of someone else's copyright, so obviously it was not a false accusation. As to it being premature, I don't know of any rule or guideline on Wikipedia giving copyright violations in Article Space any sort of grace period before being tagged as such. Clearly, you saw who tagged the article (me) so you had time to place a tag on it if you felt it was worth defending.


 * Anyway, the page you have now is very nice, and frankly, I've moved on except to respond to false accusations placed on my talk page (which you will note I haven't deleted.) NipokNek 16:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Dropped a note at User talk:SFTVLGUY2. utcursch | talk 17:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you. NipokNek 17:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you Fast Deletion!
I creation of Strange World(Computer network),But Speedy Delete.My best regards because I will hold out in the future when it was understood that you were severe. Thank you.I will express my gratitude for your having deleted it. --Gikoneko 17:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * For the record, I did not delete your article, I only tagged it as perhaps needing deletion. If you wish to petition it to be reversed, you will need to speak to the Administrator who deleted it. I am sorry if you are feeling bad about this. NipokNek 18:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

No...I thought that your judgment was adequate. I felt that it was too early to contribute this article, and, therefore, I wish to express my gratitude for your goodwill. Please watch it as it is warm might because I am not accustomed either seeming as unpleasant. I hope. Please as it is my best regards in the future. It will make an effort so that I may become wonderful wikipedian like you, too.(Machine Translated sorry).--Gikoneko 19:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Edits to Talk:Diabetes mellitus
I think you may have made a mistake when you removed a users comments in Talk:Diabetes mellitus.
 * Oh, I feel like an idiot. Yes, that was a complete mistake. Thank you very much for catching it. I have attached a little explanation and apology to the original text. --Mdwyer 18:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Redirects
Please see Redirect; thank you. --NE2 10:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I see. Thank you for taking the time to point out this guideline to me. It is one of the few I hadn't seen yet, and will probably save me many problems with editors who are not as forgiving of simple mistakes as you obviously are. (It may serve you in the future to note which edits you are refering to when leaving messages on others talk pages. Some editors make dozens and even hundreds of edits per day, and trying to figure out exactly which one is being refered to can be time-consuming, or even impossible.) NipokNek 11:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Notices (Paltan)
I had no idea of your warning about the speedy deletion tags because till then I never opened my User talk page. Sorry for any inconvenience caused in adding the warnings again and again. Miltonzs 13:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry; that was about the edit you had just made: --NE2 11:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)