User talk:Niranjan gat

Welcome
Hello, Niranjan gat, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

February 2013
Hello, I'm Raghusri. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Baadshah (2013 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Raghusri 14:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Congrats Niranjan gat you created your Teahouse profile!Face-smile.svg
Hey Niranjan gat and welcome to the Teahouse, a nice place to ask questions about how edit Wikipedia, feel free to ask! Carliitaeliza  TALK  01:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Raghusri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Baadshah (2013 film) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Raghusri 09:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Baadshah (2013 film)
First of all who is that Journalist "spended more than 10 years in media"? Can you give his/her name details. Where did i allowed 123telugu.com?, being it is one of the the official marketers of that film. Can you remember me? Because it happened a month and 7 days ago, for the reason i forgot it. My suggestion is : Your are believing that "Cinesiren" is a professional source? Then open a discussion on that article talk page and welcome several established and admin users. When Consensus reached we both may be able to know that, if users accept that source or not. But don't scold other users like this "If my content is not brought back - I will take it in the wiki senior moderator section". Regards, Raghusri (talk) 12:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

First of all - your usage of word "scold" is in-correct. What do you think anyone would do if someone removes the genuine content that they have placed on Wiki for no reason which makes them hurt and the same time the content from paid promoters are retained. The obvious approach is to take it to senior moderators on the inconsistent practices.You have to understand wiki sections first. The content that I have placed is the review of a movie - which has good content, unbiased opinion of the movie , genuine feedback and copy scape verified. Wiki is the place where good needs to be maintained and not some promoted content. you better understand it. There is no reason for you to take my away since it is not promotional material and is relevant to the section.

The reason, why I took the case of 123telugu.com is because if you see on the pages that you maintain atleat 30-40% links are for the websites like 123telugu who are the paid marketing partners of movies taking money from the makers to promote it as quoted on their respective website. How can you remove the line that I placed and forgot the line above it in the same page. It looks funny isn't.

The way you work will never encourage honest new content to come on to the wiki page and only those few websites will continue to monopolise the wiki as well. I do not wish to get into personal vandalism with you. I am not in support for all the updates of cinesiren to be accepted on wiki as well, but a movie review with proper content is rejected and a paid content is set up there. I am not talking of website, but I am about content which is what wiki is all about. Hope you understand. If you think, it is justifiable put it back or else I will try and raise it at next level. If not, sky will not fall down - I will walk away from wiki feeling it to be a polluted place. Niranjan gat (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC) Regards,Niranjan

Forgetting is Common thing for any Human being. So, that's not a Joke. Thanks for replying in a Polite manner. Raghusri (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk: Raghusri, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Raghusri 13:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to [User talk:Raghusri: Revision history] does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Raghusri 13:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Yevadu, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Because Teluguhour is not a Relibale source. Of course there is no such list in wiki for Reliable sources. But, since so many years many users are using Professional (Famous) sources. Please open a Disc., if you feel that source is Reliable in that article's talk page. But don't re add it. '' Raghusri 11:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)