User talk:Niravkumar96

Welcome Niravkumar96! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,622,127 registered editors!

Hello Niravkumar96. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, SUN EYE 1  16:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)    [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suneye1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

August 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jigarthanda (2014 film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chekka Chivantha Vaanam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. ''Diffs: If you want to remove sourced content from the article, go to the talk page and argue for its exclusion. Your personal opinion about the common-ness of a theme in film doesn't mean that you get to negate the opinion of an otherwise reliable secondary source, i.e. someone who is paid by a reputable outlet to express their opinion and observations. Nobody cares about my observations or your observations. Also, the removal of sourced content is not a minor edit, and shouldn't be erroneously marked as such.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * As previously noted, nobody cares about your personal interpretation of film themes. If reliable sources say X, that's fair game. You don't get to delete those sources just because you disagree with them. And, if you do disagree with them, you need to seek consensus for removal via discussion on the talk pages. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

My only thing it's not my personal interpretation it's the common interpretation of general people, the people who are spreading the bad rap and negative things intentionally to hurt that creator, the Wikipedia warmly welcomes them and the reliable resources is meant to be created in an intention to hurt them.That's why I have deleted those things and if you guys meant to hurt those creators as those bad rap guys then do it. Niravkumar96 (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia doesn't exist to harm anyone, but it also doesn't exist to protect anyone from criticism. Let's assume I really love playback singers and filmi pop songs. And for whatever reason, critics hate the songs that really make me dance. Is it reasonable for me to go to Wikipedia and delete properly-sourced criticism of those songs and those performers arguing that it's "the common interpretation of general people" and because I think the criticism would hurt them? Absolutely not! That's totally irrational, self-serving and emotional. You are not the arbiter of what the common person thinks or feels, and you don't get to decide what criticism a subject receives. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Okay let the people who want to hurt some one intentionally or whatever they wanna do or even the people who are paid to do those things can do anything in the name of criticism and let the Wikipedia you guys warmly welcome them, protect them,preserve them and worship them.Thank you Niravkumar96 (talk) 06:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)