User talk:Nirvana2013

What is the purpose of life? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What is the purpose of life?. Since you had some involvement with the What is the purpose of life? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

What is the meaning of life listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What is the meaning of life. Since you had some involvement with the What is the meaning of life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Best way to invest in gold listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Best way to invest in gold. Since you had some involvement with the Best way to invest in gold redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 02:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London Gold Exchange


The article London Gold Exchange has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Myexperimentswithtruth.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Myexperimentswithtruth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panama Private Interest Foundation


A tag has been placed on Panama Private Interest Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.offshoreinc365.eu/panama-foundation/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexandre Christoyannopoulos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexandre Christoyannopoulos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alexandre Christoyannopoulos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 15:44, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BullionVault


A tag has been placed on BullionVault, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 16:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

8&#61;&#61;8 Boneso (talk) 10:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jesuszeffirelliportrait.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jesuszeffirelliportrait.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at A Course in Miracles, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to A Course in Miracles have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:School shields has been nominated for discussion
Category:School shields, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steven (Editor) (talk) 00:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

"Gold/silver ratio" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gold/silver ratio and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

"Buy gold" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Buy gold and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

"Radical theology" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radical_theology&redirect=no Radical theology] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 22:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Your edit to Forest gardening has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, similar copied text at Agroecosystem, Gardening and Hunter-gatherer has been removed as well. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Concordium


A tag has been placed on Concordium, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)